relative security risks for WEP & WPA?

Wep is wep, the reasons it is crackable at 64 is the same at 128. Keep in mind that it takes about 10,000,000 packets or more captured to get a wep key, so if you are a casual user, the chances of someone breaking in are slim. To my humble knowledge, you ought to be able to run WPA on certain devices and WEP on others at the same time,, but,, this makes WPA as insecure as WEP. WPA using rc4 encrytion is supposed to be backward compatible with wep.

I'm in exactly the same boat. My GemTek WL-350 doesn't support WPA.

The short answer is "not particularly." See below.

"Making matters even worse, the cracking techniques most frequently used will work equally well no matter what WEP key length you're using. Thus, a 128-bit key is just as vulnerable as a 64-bit key. Indeed, even if a WEP key was 1,204 bits, it still as crackable by today's methods as one's that the minimal 64-bits."

No, I don't think so. Hence why I'm looking for a new mini PCI for the laptop.

According to one of those articles, the latest techniques let you crack WEP in 200,000 to 500,000 packets (64- and 128-bit respectively), not

Yousuf Khan

Maybe my specs are out of date but still for a casual user 200,000 packets is quit a bit. Considering if all packets were maxed at 2346 bytes thats about 46 gigabytes of data. I dont do anything important enough at home to worry about it. Most important or critical stuff I do over the web is encrypted using https. If people want to see what I type in newsgroups then by all means, crack my wep key and have at it.

Yes, exactly. From the SecurityFocus article:

"[T]he KoreK attacks [implemented in, for example, aircrack] change everything. No longer are millions of packets required to crack a WEP key; no longer does the number of obviously "weak" or "interesting" IVs matter. With the new attacks, the critical ingredient is the total number of unique IVs captured, and a key can often be cracked with hundreds of thousands of packets, rather than millions."

Airhead schrieb:

Strange...

I end up with 200,000 * 2346 byte = 469.2 MegaByte.

In reality, IP packets have an average size of maybe a few hundred byts (consider all the TCP management packets, login stuff ...).

Probably one shouldn't count MegaBytes, but sth. like TCP transactions... (or simply packets).

Michael

Thanks, my calculator must of had to much wine.