Opinions on Aruba A-105 WAP?

Jun 23, 2010 3 Replies

I work at a large university in a mixed use building (classrooms, labs, offices). Our current Enterasys RoamAbout-based B/G wireless system is overwhelmed when classes are in session. It's no wonder since there's only perhaps 8 WAPs for the entire building and probably 500 students and 200 office workers with smartphones, laptops, and few rogue WAPs and whatever else competing for wireless access.



Try to get a connection with your laptop - forget it. If you're very lucky and get one, hurry up and get what you need fast 'cuz you'll get dropped after a few minutes. Oh, did I say fast? Sorry, it'll take 1-2 minutes just to get to Google's homepage.



Fortunately, or perhaps unfortunately, our IT people are upgrading the entire building to Aruba A-105 WAPs. On my low occupancy floor alone I see 5 WAPs installed (we have one RoamAbout now).



Does anyone have an opinion on how well the Aruba A-105 will operate in this kind of high density, high use environment?



Lance



*****

Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, Lance chose the tried and tested strategy of:

The model of access point barely matters if they're badly sited. However, you're adding a whole load more channels by using those A + G APs, so once those are installed, I predict a sudden surge in popularity of A-band USB sticks :-)

alexd wrote the following on 6/24/2010 13:44:

Good thought alexd, connectivity is bound to be better down in the A-band.

Thanks for your comments.

Lance

*****

Or *up* in the A band, even.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required