DirectTV 20" dish, offset fed, f/d~0.7, to be used for 2.4 GHz wlan link.
As I understand the issues, the best feed is one that -- for a given focal length -- will "light" the dish with as spherical a wave as possible, that has a broad enough dispersion angle to fully "paint" the dish without picking up off-the-edge noise.
I've looked at all types of feeds, from cantennas to bi-quads to patch to dual-dipole. All have their pros and cons.
I'd like to hear from anyone who has done this before about what feed they chose and why.
Offset feed dishes have different f/D ratios depending on polarization. I just did a quicky measurement of an RCA (Thomson) dish which yields 0.67. Close enough.
formatting link
Exactly. See:
formatting link
how it works. Be sure to read chaper 6 on feeds.
Biquad should work.
formatting link
formatting link
beamwidth of the biquad is about 60 degrees. Using a protractor to eyeball my pizza dish, it wants a 70 degree angle. Close enough.
If I did everything I promised to do, I'd never get anything done.
See:
formatting link
've added a VSWR and reflection coefficient graph, main page, and NEC2 file.
formatting link
The 300MHz frequency used is handy because everything is in wavelengths. In this case, to get 2400MHz, just multiply everything by 8. For example, the 288-312MHz frequency plot is actually
2304-2496MHz. If you extract dimensions from the model, it's the same story. Multiple all dimensions that are in wavelengths by 8 to get something useable at 2400Mhz. If you want to use the design for a cell phone antenna or other frequency, just use a different scaling factor.
I think the NEC2 deck I posted is the one that came with the samples in the 4NEC2 program. (Actually, I'm not sure where it came from.) You can download the program and sample antennas from:
formatting link
The frequency plot was done by changing the FR card to: FR 0 7 0 0 288 4 This results in the plots being slightly off the ideal 300MHz frequency. Therefore, I posted the frequency plot and main page that was generated with the above frequency scan. There are probably better ways to do this, but with 9 minutes per compile, I just used what popped into my foggy brain first.
For construction details and dimensions, see:
formatting link
antenna to reflector spacing isn't horribly critical. The above construction article uses 15mm. I've been adjusting the height during construction for maximum gain and/or best VSWR and ending up with about 16mm (measured to center line of copper wire).
Have you considered using a USB wireless adapter as the feed so the line loss might be lower? I have built some illuminators for the off set feed satellite TV dish using a USB wireles adapter. But, I dont yet have any definitive results.
There's always time to do it over again after a rush job.
I found a better biquad model at:
formatting link
that compiles quickly, is much simpler, doesn't require wavelength scaling, is vertically polarized, and is much simpler than what I previously posted. I re-ran the 4NEC2 model and dumped the output at:
formatting link
NEC2 file is at:
formatting link
is about 11dBi. -3dB beamwidth is 60 degrees horizontal and 50 degrees vertical.
Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.