Verizon strike [telecom]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned this. It shows how much the world has changed. Today, Vz's unionized employees represent only a small part of its workforce, and everything today is highly automated.

In my own humble opinion, as a Vz customer, I think Vz has cut back service quality too much in its landline operations and that is a factor in their loss of landline subscribers. Some installation has been outsourced to independent people. Business, repair, and traffic (operator) offices have been consolidated and it's difficult to get a hold of a human. When I have gotten a landline employee (that is, a traditional "Bell Telephone" person), the quality of service is far higher than what I get from Vz's more modern units, such as wireless or their sales departments.

article:

formatting link
History note: In 1947 there was a phone strike and it was disruptive. The post office and Western Union both had to add people to handle extra volume. In NYC, while 90% of the phones were dial, 10% were still manual*--that meant an operator was required to complete _every_ call. Likewise, all toll calls required an operator, even city- suburban calls. Subscribers in manual areas were asked to make emergency calls only. (In the early 1950s dial was added to quite a few places and calls could be dialed between city and suburb.)

  • All of Staten Island, outer edges of Queens and the Bronx. Also almost all of suburban Long Island. The city's manual exchanges could be dialed from dial phones with the Panel Switch PCI interface to manual "B" boards, except of course during the strike. Suburban towns had old style manual numbers, ie "Babylon 354".

I shudder to think of the massive clerical cost for such 10-15c short haul toll calls. An operator had to write up a toll ticket and time the call. Then a clerk had to calculate the charge, then post it to the customer's phone bill. Sitting there going through a pile of toll tickets calculating charges by hand all day long, under the watchful high of a strict supervisor, isn't my idea of a fun job.

I wonder when they first got a real electronic computer and what kind it was.

Reply to
Lisa or Jeff
Loading thread data ...

The company I work for is telling employees who work from home offices that they should keep their total cost for a work voice telephone line under $40 per month. The preferred solution is a company VoIP system which does not require POTS. This supports the thought that Verizon and other wireline telcos might be losing business to alternate lower cost providers.

Steve

Reply to
Steve Stone

How would the workers get a VOIP line? I thought one had to have either DSL (on top of a landline), or, digital cable on top of cable TV service.

Can one get a data line _by itself_ without anything else attached to it--and one that would be cheaper than a landline?

Reply to
Lisa or Jeff

:> The company I work for is telling employees who work from home offices :> that they should keep their total cost for a work voice telephone line :> under $40 per month.  The preferred solution is a company VoIP system :> which does not require POTS.  This supports the thought that Verizon :> and other wireline telcos might be losing business to alternate lower :> cost providers.

:How would the workers get a VOIP line? I thought one had to have :either DSL (on top of a landline), or, digital cable on top of cable :TV service.

:Can one get a data line _by itself_ without anything else attached to :it--and one that would be cheaper than a landline?

Sure, most places. In Chicago, T, Comcast, and RCN will, if they serve your building, be happy to sell you just data. (So will a number of other peple who serve smaller areas of the city.) No, it won't be cheaper than a basic land line phone. But note that anyone working from home has to have a data connection these days, so the marginal cost of getting a connection that supports VOIP is pretty small (I'd want a dedicated IP telephone, though, and not an analog through a converter.).

Reply to
David Scheidt

You can get a DSL line with out having an actual working phone number but not all internet providers allow you to order this type. In my area you can order what is known as a dry loop DSL connection. They do charge extra for no phone number being bundled with the DSL but it is still cheaper than a phone number plus a DSL feed.

As for home phone service I use a NetTalk phone adapter. I have used others like Vonage and Skype.

I got rid of Vonage as it required a PC be powered on all the time to have continuous phone service, same as Skype (no adapter, just software). With the NetTalk adapter you can plug it directly into a router or your PC allowing you much more flexibility.

Here is a link that will take you to a screen for ATT's offering.

formatting link
another third party link showing offerings for them and others.
formatting link
I have had mine for a few years from what was Qwest, now CenturyLink.

Reply to
GlowingBlueMist

Cable companies will sell you just Internet, although they would rather sell you a package with TV and phone and someone's cell phone service.

In the past ILECs were supposed to sell bare DSL but I gather that since the FCC no longer enforces the rules, you can order it but you can't get it, or if you can, it's more expensive than voice+DSL.

R's, John

***** Moderator's Note *****

Do you mean that the rules are no longer in effect, that the FCC is no longer responsible for enforcing the rules, or that the FCC chooses not to?

Bill Horne Moderator

Reply to
John Levine

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:54:49 -0700 (PDT), Lisa or Jeff wrote in comp.dcom.telecom:

Charter certainly offers internet-only.

***** Moderator's Note *****

Love the domain name!

Bill Horne Moderator

Reply to
Free Lunch

Yes, and not the employers problem since they don't reimburse for home office Internet connectivity.

I don't know.

Steve

Reply to
Steve Stone

Charter is the most hated company in the US. They billed me for service

10 months after their installer removed everything from my house.
Reply to
Steven

Huh? When I had Vonage, they provided me a Cisco ATA-186 with one jack for the RJ-45 from the router and another jack with the RJ-11 to the phone. I couldn't have run it through my PC if I wanted to.

R's, John

Reply to
John Levine

... and Telecom Digest Moderator responded:

Some combination of the first and the third.

xR's, John

Reply to
John Levine

Grandstream, Aastra, Polycom, Gigaset, and quite a few other companies which make VoIP phones... most have two Ethernet ports and a built-in switch, and most speak SIP. Cisco makes VoIP phones as well, but many of these come preconfigured to use Cisco's own VoIP protocol rather than SIP.

Various Aastra models seem to be selling for between $65 and $200, depending on features. Prices vary a lot depending on brand, model, and where you buy from.

If you are willing to buy used kit, you can often find real deals. I've bought several SIP phones and analog-telephone adapters through electronics recyclers and at a local electronics flea-market, and I don't think I spent more than $15 on the most expensive one.

To get full service for these phones, you'd deal with a telephony provider who will handle both VoIP origination, and can terminate a DID phone number and route the call to you via SIP. There are many such providers... some cheap and some expensive, some fly-by-night and some with long histories of stability. Plans range anywhere from flat rate "all you can use" (up to a large limit per month) for a flat rate, down to pay-as-you-go-by-the-minute. Ask around for recommendations from existing VoIP customers.

It's possible to have an existing DID number "ported" over to a VoIP provider, just as you can port them to alternative analog dialtone providers or to cellphone providers. The FCC has made it clear that VoIP providers are bound by the same rules w.r.t porting of existing numbers.

You can quite easily "buy" DIDs in two or more cities (or overseas) and have the calls terminated to your same SIP phone or adapter or gateway/proxy. This can be very handy if you travel a lot or do work in several cities... you can have a local number in many places at not much expense.

For what it's worth - I recently ported my wife's low-usage business line over from analog (about $15/month) to VoIP, with the existing number being terminated by Vitelity. Cost per month is under $2 for the DID, plus about a penny and a half per minute for calls (inbound or outbound).

I've got another line with no DID, but outbound servide through Future Nine... about a penny a minute. Oddly, it's cheaper by a hair to call landlines in London, than landlines here in the U.S.

Both of these use our existing home DSL service, so there's no incremental data cost.

A word of caution... VoIP running on consumer-grade DSL will probably not provide call service that's entirely as reliable and glitch-free as standard switched-circuit "analog" from your telco, because very little of the TCP/IP backbone that the calls traverse will carry any sort of quality-of-service guarantee. Occasional stutters in the voice are to be expected (but I don't find them as common or severe as the artifacts present in most cellphone calls.)

I do recommend keeping at least one analog land-line with a phone that requires no separate electrical power to operate... it's good to have a plain and simple fallback in an emergency (natural disaster, network outage, etc.).

Reply to
Dave Platt

In _most_ areas you can get a 'naked' (no dial tone) DSL circuit.

The cost of such a circuit is -- almost always -- higher than the cost of DSL when it is bundled with an existing voice circuit.

This is -not- surprising, if you think about it. The telco has 'costs' (maintenance, etc.) associated with the physical circuit that are included with the _first_ service provisioned on the pair. any additional service that 'piggy-backs' on the the same pair does not have to include those costs, since they're already paid for.

There is also a 'nuisance' factor associated with a naked DSL pair. Unlike a pair with 'dial tone', a field tech cannot tell that whether pair is 'in use' (meaning 'active', not 'off hook') by simply hooking a butt-set onto the pair, and 'listening' for voice, or dial-tone. There have been *lots* of 'naked' DSL circuit outages because a field tech unwittingly 'stole' an active pair to fix another problem.

Reply to
Robert Bonomi

I usually see it labeled as a "dry line" (i.e., no battery.)

In Bell Canada territory, the cost depends on your area, and varies from $7.25 per month to $25.10 per month. Obviously, the low end is a fraction of what the most basic POTS service costs, but by the time you add the DSL service, dry line fee, and VoIP service you're saving little if anything. However, VoIP may an economical option for a second phone line, which may be very desirable if you work from home. VoIP service also usually includes features that cost extra to add to POTS service. It may also permit you to connect to your company's phone service so that your direct number or extension rings wherever you want it... but that's another story.

Reply to
Geoffrey Welsh

Right you are John.

Sorry, it appears that my memory was malfunctioning as usual. I meant to say that I had booted Magic Jack, not Vonage.

Reply to
GlowingBlueMist

[Moderator snip]

Lineman have been equipped with DSL detecting butt sets for many years now. When the butt set is connected to a DSL signal pair it sounds an alarm and / or will not go off hook. So accidental downing of DSL service is no longer that much of a problem. Some Butt sets can even function like a piggy back telephone and conduct voice calls without downing the line. I own two such Harris sets.

-- Tom Horne

Reply to
Tom Horne

I can state -- from first-hand experience as recently as 2005 -- that 'stealing' "DSL-only' pairs _does_ happen. I

the shop were I was employed at that time provided DSL for all employees, to support "work-at-home", when needed. One employee was in a near- saturated neighborhood, and 'lost' their DSL 3 times in a little less than

2 years. The last time got 'messy', as there were =zero= spare pairs when another customer's line failed. The DSL-only pair got 'stolen', and there _wasn't_ any pair to 'replace' it with, when the DSL circuit problem was reported.
Reply to
Robert Bonomi

Perhaps, but a couple of weeks ago I had a (naked) DSL problem that the tech who came out blamed on just such a cause. "Well, I don't want to say anything against the [new ownership and name] company, but some of the contractors they hire don't recognize a DSL without dialtone..."

Whether that was in fact the problem, I have no way to know. But he then went to the cabinet (2 blocks away) and came back and said "it's fixed".

Dave

Reply to
Dave Garland

I had a Linksys RT31P2 that had the same setup. No computer required. You did need a computer to manage your account but that is the entire extent of it.

Reply to
T

I've had plenty of digital circuits and loop circuits of various sorts nynexed over the years, but then again I have also had a few active pots circuits taken down too. Dial tone is no guarantee they won't nynex it.

--scott

Reply to
Scott Dorsey

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.