Re: Vonage Sued to Quit Using Verizon Patents

"Dynamic Address Translation" is an impressive phase, but early

> machines had nothing more than a relocation register and a protection > register. The user's memory addresses were summed with the relocation > register to get a physical address. The protection register set an > upper bounds on the user's memory access and caused a trap or fault to > the kernel if exceeded.

Funny you should mention that, IIRC a KA-10 processor (first of the DEC10 line) had two protect/relocate register sets. One for the 'high' segment, usually pure code, and one for the 'low', mixed code and data. I did spend some time playing with KA-10 s/n 9, which had only one set. In the early days, the registes were optional, as was the byte-pointer and floating point hardware.

I disagree. I installed a fully functional 8-user timeshare system > on a PDP 8 with 12k words of memory back in 1972. The early > Unix and Decsystem 10's were amazingly efficient for the resources > available then.

Yes. A DECsystem10 KA-10 processor would happily do 40+ users with

160kwords of -core-. That's using a 1Mword drum as swap device and with about 44k resident as the monitor (o/s). Of course, it wasn't a speed demon compared to systems ten years later, but for the time, it was great.

Also, since a "batch process" effectively means performing some processing based on pre-written instructions, as opposed to interactive instructions, a PDP-8 could certainly do them. Not fast, mind you, but it could.


Reply to
Carl Zwanzig
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.