Re: Psst: Traditional 911 Doesn't Always Work, Either

Quick, somebody let Mike Cox (our Michigan Attorney General) know

> about this, so he can threaten a real phone company with a lawsuit > instead of picking on VoIP companies ... >
formatting link
> Psst: Traditional 911 Doesn't Always Work, Either Some think VoIP > carriers are getting a bad rap. > While the impression is there's been a rash of deaths thanks to bad > VoIP 911 connectivity, the truth is many of the "baby death" cases > (like this one
formatting link
) are > more rhetoric than substance. An interesting discussion in our VoIP > forum
formatting link
, on how > traditional 911 systems often fail (see Boston Herald >
formatting link
without so much as a peep from the FCC or Congress, who've jumped all > over VoIP. > Article + reader comments at: >
formatting link
> How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home: >
formatting link
> If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group: >
formatting link

The Boston Herald story was interesting. But in that case it was probably Intrado that dropped the ball, not Verizon. In any case, this all demonstrates that E-911 is a complex system, and complex systems fail all the time.

But the general consensus is that the incumbent carriers are trying to do one of two things. Either they're trying to throw off the yoke of what little regulation still exists, or they're trying to kill VoIP providers. I'd bet on the latter.

Right now the incumbent carriers are playing all sort of games because their revenue streams are being threatened. Just look at the efforts they've thrown in to killing government owned metropolitan 802.11 networks.

Instead of lowering prices and investing in research and development, the incumbents would rather rake everyone over the coals in search of profit.

It isn't that profit is a bad, just that excessive profit rankles, particularly when used as the reason for a corporation to behave in an abhorrent manner.

Reply to
Tony P.
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.