Re: Party Line Dialing, was Re: Telephone Area Codes and Prefixes

In article , TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to :

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Am I correct in thinking that all > party-line subscribers were geographically close to each other (such > as a few doors away, or across the alley?) Were they nearly or always > on the same cable out of the central office? Or were there party line > subscribers across town from each other? PAT]

Originally, party lines were intended to conserve wire-pairs.

As such the parties were served off the same trunk cable. Usually the same wire-pair all the way to the customer premises. It would have been possible, albeit unlikely, for the parties to be on separate 'feeder' cables to a concentration point, and shared a single wire pair only from the concentration point back to the C.O.

They didn't have to be in 'immediate' proximity to each other, they could be anywhere a 'multiple' tap on that cable pair existed.

In the 'late days' of part-line use, when the only users were those who were grandfathered in on a 'discontinued' tariff, it was _not_ uncommon to find the 'parties' in wildly different physical locations, with each on their own dedicated pair, all the way from the C.O. to the C.P.

Reply to
Robert Bonomi
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.