> Effective alternatives:
>>
>> 1) Online billing (which saves trees as well, and is worth doing
>> for its own sake), combined with onscreen magnification
>> (Cmd-+) or even automated text to voice translation of the >> online bills..
>>
>> (And, acquiring some simple computer skills can have many other
>> advantages for elderly individuals with or without deteriorating
>> vision: receiving photos on line from the grandkids, email,
>> promoting and preserving mental skills and contact with the
>> outside world.)
I went to an estate sale the other day where a computer, mice, cables and other accessories were on sale. A senior citizen residential facility advertises among thier amenities a computer available to residents. However, I will never agree to accept billing on line. I was in a hospital and an assisted living facility afterward for a time and if it were not for the paper bills I would have become seriously delinquent in payments. I think it is inappropriate to bring up "social benefits" in this discussion. . . it is not the function of a utility to be an agent of social activism.
I don't think that's a viable option. Elderly voters cling to their
> ways and distrust new gadgets - let's face it, that's part of
> getting old. It's nice to hope that our seniors will embrace new
> things, but it's not that simple. American society places a premium
> on independence and self-sufficiency, so I think most seniors would
> rather keep to the paper they already know how to use, rather than
> having to ask for help to learn about computers.
>> 2) Online bill paying (if your vision is really too bad to read a
bill, is it good enough to write a check? And address an envelope?)
> If your vision is too bad to read a bill, you won't be able to check
> your phone bill to see if your grandkids are calling pay-per-vote
> lines for an online talent show, or if your caregiver is burning up
> the wires to another state during your nap. _Writing_ a check
> doesn't require particularly good eyesight, and the envelopes are > pre-addressed.
Nit pick--in the case cited where a smll municipality sends bills on postcards there is no return envelope.
> 3) Assistance from friends or volunteer staffers at a local senior
>> center (which has all kinds of ancillary advantages in social
>> contact and can protect against the kind of despicable but
>> omnipresent lottery and stock scams which prey on the old
>> folks -- as my wife and I can sadly tell you all about from
>> our years caring for aging parents).
>>
>
> Nice if it's available without too long a wait - many seniors have
> bladder issues - and if it's free and accurate; not so nice if it
> becomes an opportunity to solicit the patrons for "worthy"
> causes. While stock and lottery scams are despicable, the
> fund-raising efforts of many charitable organizations don't stand
> close examination either, with seniors sometimes subjected to
> harangues about modifying their wills to endow the charity in
> question, or accepting "home help" from youthful volunteers who are
> paid less than half of what the "Charity" which supplies them
> collects. In any case, depending on volunteers to accomplish a
> public-policy objective is just bad public policy.
Something that doesn't bear close examination either is the oft-repeated assertion that seniors are more vulnerable to despicable stock and lottery scams (often cited as seniors are "more "trusting"), The peercentage of seniors who are taken in by scams are almost identical with the percentage of the population as a whole. In general my observation is that seniors are less trusting than younger people. They have learned from experience.
Wes Leatherock snipped-for-privacy@aol.com snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com