Re: NANP Number Lengths

On 9/23/1962, the New York Times had a very detailed article on the

> conversion to All Number Calling (ANC), consumer opposition and > frustration to ANC, and future prospects of telephone systems. This > may answer some of your questions of how the system evolved. The NYT > is available on microfilm or CDROM in many large libraries.

It's also available to Times Select subscribers on the internet.

Interesting how the article discusses:

Data transmission at an "amazing" 2000 bits per second. AT&T had predicted that 2L+5N dialing would have reached capacity by 1970. ANC would resolve capacity issues until 2000 (only 5 years off). The reason behind not going to a 3L+5N dialing plan. The magic Electronic Central Office of the future, with its 23,000 neon-filled tubes, that would allow (what we know now as) 3-way calling, speed dialing, call forwarding, and home intercom.

Reply to
Stan Schwartz
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.