Re: High-Tech Sniffers Try to Stop 'Dirty' Bombs

By Mark Clayton, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

> If a terrorist tried to sneak a "dirty" bomb into the United States, > would anyone notice? > Possibly. Radiation detectors rushed into service since 9/11 might > sound the alarm at seaports, border checkpoints, and mail-handling > facilities.

(snipped)

Innovative technologies: One possible technology, from Lawrence > Livermore National Laboratory, is RadNet, a kind of global positioning > system married to a radiation detector packed into a cellphone. The > idea is that this "cellphone sniffer" could be carried by police > officers on their daily routes -- all the while detecting radiation > and transmitting coordinates to a computer that maps hot zones for > investigation.

Or perhaps rudimentary radiation detectors (and possibly sensors of other types, bio or chemical) built into _every_ cell phone: one sensor per phone, randomly allocated, not available to user control.

If the sensor detects a signal above a set threshold, the phone just silently dials in to a collection center computer, reports the fact, then shuts down for a selected dead time.

The collection center computers collect and collate all these reports, and if a sufficient density of reports start showing up in a given area (or along a given track), alerts a human to take a look at the accumulated data, and maybe send a human responder out to look at the general location, or perhaps just auto-query other phones in the same area.

Location to the nearest cell tower ought to be enough for a start; GPS location accuracy not required, at least not initially. The problem of occasional false positives is greatly reduced by having a large ensemble of reporting devices.

If you can build a complete camera into a cell phone for, what is it, about $10 or $20, seems like, with a little development, you should be able to put in just a single rudimentary sensor for the same or less.

If I were to post this same idea to comp.risks, I suspect a lot of potential downsides and unanticipated problems with it would also emerge. Seems worth thinking about nonetheless.

Reply to
AES
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.