If your referring to my story its just that -- a personal story. You won't find it in the paper and it certainly wasn't in the local news. Heck in today's world of stalkers and murders I'm amazed I couldn't find others with similar problems via a search. In any event if you really want proof I can at the very least probably dig up a police report and pdf it to you -- for proper monetary compensation of not less than $25.
For what its worth by sheer coincidence the idiot called from a pay phone last night an left a message. He has probably figured out that something isn't right since he could leave a message with the first try on a pay phone and couldn't do it again, since I blocked it.
Sheesh Pat!
Because of your extreme dislike of SBC you seem to have fallen for
> this advertisement written as a sob story about harrassing phone calls
> that "no one would do anything about." The story has all the earmarks
> of an urban ledgend -- no verifiable facts and no way to ascertain
> even if the story is true.
> Rodgers Platt
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: All I can do is speak to my own
> experience. I was harassed for a couple months by AT&T (of all
> people!) who three or four times per day would call me on my
> ring-ring (distinctive ringing) line, looking for someone I had
> never heard of, and because of SBC's alleged inability to do anything
> to help me eventually _I_ had to invest in a long distance call at
> my own expense to call them back and trace through it with them. And
> SBC (to name just one of the Bell companies) absolutely refuses to
> do _anything_ about harassing phone calls except charge their
> _customer_ fifteen dollars for each use of *57. Bell used to have
> an 'Annoyance Call Bureau' to deal with those things; now apparently
> that has to be a profit center for them like everything else. PAT]