Northern District Of California Doubles Down On Dismissal Of Wiretapping Claims Under State Privacy Law [telecom]

By J. Colin Knisely (Philadelphia) and Michael Zullo (Philadelphia)

On the heels of holding that defendants' use of session replay software did not constitute a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Judge William Alsup in Williams v. What If Holdings LLC and ActiveProspect Inc. has now denied the plaintiff's request for leave to amend. In doing so, the court reaffirmed its previous holding that the plaintiff's allegations only established that ActiveProspect's use of session replay software functioned as a tool that supported What If's management of its own website data, and not as a means of eavesdropping and aggregating information for ActiveProspect's own purposes.

formatting link

Reply to
Bill Horne
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.