NC votes to end telephone regulation [telecom]

May 20, 2009 3 Replies

I don't recall seeing this here yet.



formatting link
"The [North Carolina] House on Wednesday voted 102-11 to allow 16 providers that cover the state to cut loose from state Utilities Commission conditions setting the rates, terms, and quality of their landline services."



The same old, tired arguments.. no longer monopolies, consumers benefit from competition, etc.



"It's not possible for consumers to get the full benefit of a competitive marketplace when that marketplace is impacted by rules that were in place to regulate a monopoly industry that no longer exists," Clifton Metcalf, a spokesman for AT&T, said.



Right. Anybody want to buy a bridge?


***** Moderator's Note *****

Actually, one could make a case for the removal of government regulation by saying that it's obviously ineffective, and clearly corrupt, and that it's best for consumers of telecommunications services to know that they're on their own and can't expect any help from Uncle Sam.



Bill Horne Temporary Moderator


*******************************************************************************************************
  • The address for email submissions has changed: if you submit posts via email, send them to *
  • telecomdigestmoderator atsign telecom-digest.org. If you submit posts via a newsreader or *
  • Google groups, you don't need to change anything. *

*******************************************************************************************************

saying that it's obviously ineffective, and clearly corrupt, and that it's best for consumers of telecommunications services to know that they're on their own and can't expect any help from Uncle Sam.

Then let's do away with subscriber subsidies for "universal service" (isn't that a quaint term?), low-income service, 911 add-ons, etc.

marketplace when that marketplace is impacted

exists," Clifton Metcalf, a spokesman for

saying that it's obviously ineffective, and clearly corrupt, and that it's best for consumers of telecommunications services to know that they're on their own and can't expect any help from Uncle Sam.

*******************************************************************************************************

email, send them to *

via a newsreader or *

*
*******************************************************************************************************

The problem is that you end up at best with a duopoly and at worst and oligarchy with great collusion in price fixing.

This won't bode well for North Carolina.

Aside from 911, does North Carolina impose any of those other cross subsidies in law? Several states do, in addition to federal.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required