Digital Cellular Sound Quality

[Please withhold my email address.]

My old analog cell phone, a Nokia 918, has a cheap, grandfathered rate plan, so I'm not likely to upgrade unless Cingular rips out their analog equipment. Get this: the phone's logo is "Ameritech"!

Whenever I have a conversation with a modern cell phone user, it's digital-ness is highly obvious because the sound quality is so bad.

I assumed digital meant higher quality. Even today, digital is called "advanced technology." To wit:

Digital phones use advanced technology that converts voices into numeric code, which is then transmitted to the phone and decoded. ... Reception, sound quality, battery life, and security features are superior to analog.

formatting link
Well, it not very advanced from my perspective -- it's a step backward. And to say that digital "sound quality .. [is] superior" is a lie. Because of the low sample rate (is it 8 KHz?), it's not possible to reconstruct perfect speech.

Is this situation ever likely to be improved? Why isn't it possible to sample at a higher rate, compress the result in the phone for transmission, and then decompress at the base (and do the same thing for the reverse channel)? Are all digital cellular phones the same? Aren't many people bothered by the horrible sound quality?

Jeff

Reply to
Jeffrey Mattox
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.