Cellcos ripping people off (was: Does SMS messaging keep going ...) [telecom]

> SMS uses the signaling or paging channels and does not require a > dedicated connection, and moreover does not use much "bandwidth," so > thousands of text messages occupy the same network capacity that > would support only one voice call.

Which is why so many of us were absolutely torqued when the cellcos increased the cost for individual text messages from piddling to 20 cents or more for providing the service charging 1000% or more over the price it actually costs to provide the service. They want to force people to buy message packages. Just recently Death Star... er AT&T changed and where they formerly offered a package of 1,000 messages for $5 discontinued that package so they could have only one offering "unlimited" for $20 per month.

Reply to
Joseph Singer
Loading thread data ...

While the *transmission* of SMS is fairly trivial as far as network resources go, it still requires back-end infrastructure to potentially store *all* the messages (for a certain period) in case immediate delivery is not available so there is a cost for that which will increase with overall SMS use.

Even with that, all telco's everywhere seem to use SMS as a high profit "cash cow" even though (in Australia) they shot themselves in the foot for years by keeping the price so high it discouraged use of SMS. Once the cost dropped the use of SMS skyrocketed and the telcos made more money than they dreamed of - whoda thunk it!

-- Regards, David.

David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.

Reply to
David Clayton

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.