Yea, and then when you decide you want to try another firewall and need to remove ZA be prepared for the nightmare that will ensue.
Yea, and then when you decide you want to try another firewall and need to remove ZA be prepared for the nightmare that will ensue.
Yea, well, if you have a router with firewall you don't need one.
Well, it's easy enough for anyone to install the free version of ZA on their computer, run a sniffer (e.g. Wireshark) to inspect the network traffic, and see for themselvers who is or isn't the "know-nothing".
cu
59cobalt
Actually the current versions of ZA can be removed rather cleanly.
cu
59cobalt
Or if you are not offering any network services. Then you can also get by without one.
I used to use Sygate - but Symantec owns them now.......
No one has mentioned Jetico. What are your thoughts and experiences with their FW?
TIA
Louise
In
Never used it, sorry.
Mr. Orwell opined.....
There are no more updates if you use w> For pete's sake, get Zone Alarm's freebie.
It is virtually leakproof. It is free. for blocking in/out it may be the very best. It is extraordinarily difficult to configure. It has driven strong people to the point of insanity :>>>
gary
louise wrote:
So what firewall does your top-post refer to Gaz?
Jim Ford
(quoting fixed)
Who cares? Win9x has no privilege separation and is therefore pretty useless.
Worthful - it doesn't spend complexity and resources on useless trials.
That's exactly no difference from any other host-based packet filter.
Jetico
Nope.
I know.
I know.
But if you need outbound application control as a weapon against malware you are trying to fight malware already running inside the system you are trying to protect - in which case you should already be in the process of restoring your machine to a clean state - since you lost the game.
That's true in any case.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required