Why do I get these traceroute results?

Sep 28, 2006 1 Replies

My situation



Internet - (1841 Multilink (2 x ADSL)) - Cisco 871(NAT) - LAN


If I traceroute to Microsoft



traceroute: Warning:

formatting link
has multiple addresses; using



207.46.18.30 traceroute to lb1.www.ms.akadns.net (207.46.18.30), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 router (192.168.100.253) 0.904 ms 0.768 ms 0.851 ms 2 172.16.0.254 (172.16.0.254) 2.208 ms 2.041 ms 2.094 ms 3 ginkgo.dsl.enta.net (87.127.229.4) 15.716 ms 14.792 ms 15.450 ms 4 telehouse-east.dsl.enta.net (87.127.229.1) 16.955 ms 15.141 ms 14.955 ms 5 gi1-8.telehouse-east2.bdr.enta.net (62.249.192.125) 15.096 ms 29.908 ms 15.328 ms 6 if-9-1-3035.core2.LDN-London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.67.201) 15.695 ms
16.249 ms 14.921 ms 7 if-4-0.core1.LDN-London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.69) 197.495 ms
34.247 ms 207.838 ms 8 if-1-0.core2.NQT-NewYork.Teleglobe.net (207.45.220.37) 175.472 ms
199.727 ms 108.133 ms 9 if-3-2.mcore4.NQT-NewYork.teleglobe.net (216.6.87.13) 86.506 ms 85.486 ms 90.657 ms
10 if-4-0.mcore4.PDI-PaloAlto.teleglobe.net (216.6.86.13) 163.082 ms
161.486 ms 163.487 ms
11 if-0-0.core3.PDI-PaloAlto.Teleglobe.net (207.45.196.77) 162.469 ms
217.819 ms 160.404 ms
12 64.86.190.1 (64.86.190.1) 200.494 ms 200.640 ms 203.731 ms
13 if-3-0.core2.SEP-Seattle.teleglobe.net (66.110.64.9) 178.707 ms
177.906 ms 177.970 ms
14 ix-5-1.core2.SEP-Seattle.Teleglobe.net (207.45.196.50) 172.848 ms
172.919 ms 173.861 ms
15 gig4-1.wst-76cb-1b.ntwk.msn.net (207.46.40.35) 173.956 ms 173.323 ms
173.856 ms
16 ten9-2.tuk-76cb-1b.ntwk.msn.net (207.46.35.165) 177.961 ms 173.892 ms
173.487 ms
17 ten2-3.tuk-76c-1a.ntwk.msn.net (207.46.35.73) 173.472 ms 172.414 ms
175.226 ms
18 po14.tuk-65ns-mcs-1a.ntwk.msn.net (207.46.35.134) 173.467 ms 172.076 ms 173.358 ms
19 * * *

If I traceroute to apple



traceroute to

formatting link
(17.112.152.32), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 router (192.168.100.253) 0.772 ms 0.744 ms 0.849 ms 2 172.16.0.254 (172.16.0.254) 2.231 ms * 2.379 ms 3 * ginkgo.dsl.enta.net (87.127.229.4) 18.013 ms * 4 telehouse-east.dsl.enta.net (87.127.229.1) 18.231 ms * 17.037 ms 5 * gi2-6.telehouse-east.core.enta.net (62.249.192.121) 15.743 ms * 6 te5-2.telehouse-east2.bdr.enta.net (87.127.236.34) 58.202 ms * 15.720 ms 7 * 195.50.113.141 (195.50.113.141) 16.355 ms * 8 ae-19-55.ebr1.London1.Level3.net (4.68.116.158) 15.464 ms * ae-19-51.ebr1.London1.Level3.net (4.68.116.30) 15.727 ms 9 * ae-4.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.109) 99.261 ms *



10 ae-4.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.109) 88.725 ms * *
11 ae-1-100.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.26) 92.446 ms * 90.170 ms
12 ae-2.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.69.132.65) 111.243 ms *
*
13 ae-1-100.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.69.132.37) 132.049 ms *
ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net (4.69.132.61) 134.516 ms
14 * ae-3.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.132.57) 162.056 ms *
15 * * ae-3.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.132.57) 162.013 ms
16 * ae-1-100.ebr1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.132.1) 170.415 ms *
17 ae-4-4.car2.Sacramento1.Level3.net (4.69.132.157) 256.533 ms 241.840 ms *
18 ae-11-11.car1.Sacramento1.Level3.net (4.69.132.149) 362.134 ms *

164.227 ms
19 * APPLE-COMPU.car1.Level3.net (64.158.148.6) 165.116 ms !X *
20 * * APPLE-COMPU.car1.Level3.net (64.158.148.6) 165.736 ms !X
21 * APPLE-COMPU.car1.Level3.net (64.158.148.6) 167.516 ms !X *
22 APPLE-COMPU.car1.Level3.net (64.158.148.6) 165.469 ms !X * *
23 APPLE-COMPU.car1.Level3.net (64.158.148.6) 166.038 ms !X * 166.732 ms !X

This is consistent. What worries me is I even loose packets to the 1841 (172.16.0.254) on a traceroute



traceroute 172.16.0.254 traceroute to 172.16.0.254 (172.16.0.254), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 router (192.168.100.253) 0.868 ms 0.814 ms 0.836 ms 2 172.16.0.254 (172.16.0.254) 2.084 ms * 2.239 ms



but not if I traceroute to microsoft? Also flood pings are fine to the 1841.


Chris


...

Cisco routers limit the rate at which they'll send ICMP Port Unreachable messages, and the limit is slower than the rate that traceroute sends its probes.

If you use the traceroute option that sends ICMP instead of UDP, you won't see the * in this case.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required