walter , did I do this right ?

Jul 13, 2005 1 Replies

access-list outside_access_in permit tcp any interface outside range 3060



3064

static (inside,outside) udp interface 3061 192.168.0.122 3061 netmask



255.255.25
5.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) udp interface 3060 192.168.0.122 3060 netmask
255.255.25
5.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) udp interface 3062 192.168.0.122 3062 netmask
255.255.25
5.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) udp interface 3063 192.168.0.122 3063 netmask
255.255.25
5.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) udp interface 3064 192.168.0.122 3064 netmask
255.255.25
5.255 0 0


It works - but I always wonder ....


In article , Barret Bonden wrote: :access-list outside_access_in permit tcp any interface outside range 3060 3064

:static (inside,outside) udp interface 3061 192.168.0.122 3061 netmask

255.255.255.255 0 0 :static (inside,outside) udp interface 3060 192.168.0.122 3060 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

:It works - but I always wonder ....

I was about to say, "Looks okay to me, as long as there is an

access-group outside_access_in in interface outside "

but then I noticed a problem.

Your ACL entry permits tcp, but your static's are for udp.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required