Re: Cell Phones and Driving: Research Update [telecom]

Cell Phones and Driving:

> >A substantial proportion of the American public believes that drivers >using cell phones are a serious traffic safety problem and that it is >unacceptable to use a cell phone while driving. Respondents who >express negative attitudes toward cell phone use while driving were >found to be somewhat less likely to use cell phones while driving; >however, a substantial proportion of respondents who express negative >attitudes toward using a cell phone while driving still admit doing >so at least occasionally. About two- thirds of drivers who use cell >phones while driving believe that it is safer to talk on a hands-free >cell phone than on a hand-held cell phone; however, the overwhelming >majority of available evidence suggests that it is not. >

The research is too generalized when it comes to hand-free units. They allow both hands to be on the wheel, thus removing one dangerous element; that is, holding a phone to the ear with only one hand on the wheel.

The other factor is driver training, experience, and discipline at conducting communications while operating a vechicle. Police do it all the time as do others in public safety. So do professional aircraft pilots. If were possible to factor out these individuals with this type of communications in their professional life I suspect the results would show that hands-free wireless communications is quite safe with these people.

Reply to
Sam Spade
Loading thread data ...

....... I believe the problem is the assumption that the physical act of holding a phone while driving is the inherently dangerous factor - the research shows that the actual conversation is the danger.

Assuming that not holding a phone handset while driving makes it "safe" seems to be disproved by this (and other) research. It may be "safer", but by no means is it safe enough to be allowed for the vast majority of driver on the world's roads.

Reply to
David Clayton

But note that those people conduct short, ritualized transactions over the radio. The cop is not negotiating with his daughter who wants to get a tattoo, and the aircraft pilot is not talking to his pissed-off wife. The fire engine driver is not talking to his grandmother or drinking buddy.

I don't think there is any way to generalize on-the-job public safety communications to the general public's telephone calls, even when the general public is that same cop or pilot.

Dave

Reply to
Dave Garland

Exactly. Traditional 2-way-radio communication is snappy, serves limited predefined purposes, and is done with full acknowledgement that at least one of the people is driving. Traditional telephone conversation expects a person's full attention.

Reply to
MC

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.