Same Tunnel Interface destination with 2 different next-hop IPs

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
I am currently trying to build 2 Tunnel Interfaces across 2 different links,
with 2 Cisco 2600s. Router 1 is the router with 2 Next-Hop IPs Router 2.

This poses a problem, I need to get the tunnel 10's traffic to only go
through the 192.168.10.254 (fa0/0) next-hop IP, and tunnel 20's traffic to
only go through the 192.168.20.254 (fa0/1) next hop IP. I am stuck because
the 2 destinations are the same. Is there any way to accomplish this?


Router 1
============
Fast Ethernet 0/0 - 192.168.10.1/24
Fast Ethernet 0/1 - 192.168.20.1/24

ip route 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.254
ip route 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.20.254

interface tunnel 10
   //some output omitted
   tunnel-source fastEthernet 0/0
   tunnel-destination 192.168.30.1
!

interface tunnel 20
   //some output omitted
   tunnel-source fastEthernet 0/1
   tunnel-destination 192.168.30.1
!

Router 2
============
Fast Ethernet 0/0 - 192.168.30.1/24

Thanks in Advance!



Re: Same Tunnel Interface destination with 2 different next-hop IPs
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Well, the first thought that comes to mind is Policy Based Routing, but you
haven't really given enough info. Why are you building two tunnels from/to
the same locations and what makes the distinction of what traffic should go
through which tunnel?



Re: Same Tunnel Interface destination with 2 different next-hop IPs
I am attempting to load balance across 2 internet connections, one connected
to each fast ethernet interface, and I want to do CEF per-packet round robin
through each of the tunnels. This is primarily for the upstream direction.



Quoted text here. Click to load it



Site Timeline