When You Dial 911, Can Help Find You?

May 12, 2005 Cellphone Hangup: When You Dial 911, Can Help Find You? As More People Go Wireless, Patchwork of Call Centers Slows Locater System Upgrade Money Spent on Boots By ANNE MARIE SQUEO Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

In November 1993, Jennifer Koon, under attack by a vicious assailant, dialed 911 from her cellphone. But the dispatcher in upstate New York could only listen helplessly for 20 minutes as the 18-year-old, unable to give her exact location, was beaten, driven to an alley and shot to death. The technology wasn't available to find her.

Almost 12 years later, more than half of the U.S. still lacks the technology to find cellphone callers in distress. Though the federal government is spending billions of dollars annually on homeland security, the 911 system that Americans rely on to report an emergency hasn't benefited.

With the explosive growth of wireless technology, more than a third of the 190 million calls placed to 911 each year now come from cellphones. Even as some of the nation's biggest cellular carriers face a December deadline to upgrade their systems for 911 calls, many emergency-call centers won't be able to receive the data. Virtually all of the nation's 6,000 call centers can locate land-line phones, but only 41% of them can locate cellphones, public-safety officials say. And the situation is getting worse with the growing popularity of Internet-based phone services -- some of which can't access traditional

911 service.

No federal agency has the authority to drive the local, state and federal governments, as well as dozens of wireless and local-phone companies, toward a solution. The cellular industry initially reacted slowly because of costs and liability concerns. Public-safety officials estimate it would take $8 billion and at least four more years to modernize the nation's 911 system for wireless calls. And that doesn't include the costs of updating the system to handle Internet phone services.

Meanwhile, cash-strapped states have diverted funds earmarked for 911 to balance budgets and pay for unrelated items, including winter boots and dry cleaning for the New York State Police. While Congress passed a law last year to pay for some upgrades and stop the state raids on 911 money, President Bush, facing his own budget problems, has declined to fund that initiative.

"These are front-burner challenges getting back-burner treatment," says Michael Copps, a commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission. "The government itself is still working on developing a nationwide plan. It just does not exist yet."

According to the latest information compiled by the National Emergency Number Association, a nonprofit corporation focused on public-safety communications issues, only six states, plus the District of Columbia, have the technology in place to find 911 wireless callers from most places in the state. Three more are close to completion. Sixteen states, including New Jersey, Arizona and Ohio, have upgraded less than

10% of their counties, NENA says. Six of those states haven't finished a single county.

Even within many states, coverage is uneven, with some counties and cities receiving upgrades while neighboring ones haven't. A modernized call center in the South Side of Chicago, for example, often helps locate cellphone callers in nearby cities where emergency operators lack the technology to do it themselves.

Big Shift

Part of the 911 problem is the result of a vast shift among consumers away from traditional fixed-line phones toward new technologies. Older phones are easy to find because they are plugged into the wall at a specific address and aren't moveable. When a 911 call is made from that number, the location automatically pops up on the computer screen in front of the call-center operator who answers.

But consumers increasingly favor cellular and Internet services because they offer cheaper rates and greater mobility -- the very thing that makes callers difficult to find. About 6% of the nation's 182 million cellphone users have gotten rid of their home phones, according to industry analysts, who say the percentage will continue to rise.

Technology offers two ways to pinpoint wireless callers. Global Positioning System satellites can be used to find the caller if cellphones are equipped with a special chip, and the local 911 center has been upgraded to receive specific latitude and longitude data. That's the system being used by Verizon Wireless, Nextel Communications Inc. and Sprint Corp. Two other major cellular companies, Cingular Wireless and T-Mobile USA, a unit of Deutsche Telecom AG, are using triangulation -- measuring the distance of a signal from three different cellphone towers -- to locate 911 callers.

But these technologies face challenges. Cellular providers using GPS have to get their customers to buy a new phone equipped with a special computer chip for their location system to work. In March, a man died in a Long Island snowstorm after calling 911 from an older cellphone that couldn't transmit his coordinates, even though the local call center had satellite-locator technology. Triangulation has proved problematic in rural areas, where towers, if there are any, are often built in straight lines along highways. That makes it difficult to get three separate measures to locate a 911 caller.

The FCC has set a year-end deadline for Verizon, Nextel and Sprint to upgrade nearly all their customers to GPS-enabled phones. But even if the companies persuade people with older phones to upgrade, no similar deadline has been set for local and state governments to get their equipment in place to handle such calls. And no federal agency has the jurisdiction to set one.

Internet-phone services offer an entirely different host of problems. These services allow consumers in, say, Boise, Idaho, to get a phone number with a Boston area code, which raises questions about where a

911 call would be routed. Public-safety officials say new technology is needed to locate the call center nearest the Internet modem making the call, regardless of the phone number.

Some Internet phone services don't let users connect to 911 or they route callers to nonemergency numbers. Earlier this year, a family in Houston with Internet phone service couldn't alert police that two armed robbers had forced their way into the family's home and shot both parents in the legs. When their daughter called 911, she could only get a recorded message to hang up and try a different phone.

Later this month, the FCC is expected to require Vonage Holdings Corp., the nation's biggest Internet phone provider, and others to provide a direct connection to the 911 network, according to commission officials.

To provide a similar level of 911 service as traditional phones, new Internet protocols need to be written to allow the transmission of location data in addition to the voice call. New switching equipment and routers are also needed. The cost would be far less than the wireless 911 upgrade. Several companies are offering middleman solutions to allow Internet phone companies to connect to 911 networks, and Verizon and SBC have said they'll begin offering some direct connections to the 911 networks they run to companies like Vonage.

The difficulties involved in upgrading the system can partly be traced to 911's origin in the late 1960s, when AT&T still ran most of the country's phone service. In 1968, the company decided to make 911 a nationwide emergency number. At that time, Los Angeles County had 50 different phone numbers to reach the police; St. Louis had 32 for police and 57 for fire emergencies, according to the FCC.

Because rescue services fell under local, not federal, oversight, officials in Washington left it to the cities to set up operator centers to receive calls to the new number. It took until the late

1990s before 96% of the U.S. had 911 service, but some 200 counties still don't. Calls to 911 are routed to the nearest emergency call center. Wireless 911 calls generally get routed based on their location when the call is made.

Crowded Scene

The breakup of Ma Bell made the picture even more complicated by spawning dozens of cellular and local-phone companies, all with a role to play in updating the 911 system. In 1996, the FCC called for upgrading the nation's entire system within five years to make it able to pinpoint cellphone callers to within about a 400-foot radius. But regulators didn't tell individual cellular companies and local officials how to accomplish this task, or pay for it. As a result, the deadline wasn't met.

"The wireless carriers were saying, 'We can't do this, our industry is in its infancy and these costs will stifle growth,' " said Anthony Haynes, executive director of the Tennessee Emergency Communications Board. Carriers also worried about liability issues if a 911 call was lost. Congress indemnified them against this in 1999.

Local-phone companies have presented obstacles, too. Excluded from FCC talks outlining the upgrades, some wanted to dictate the technology used in the upgrades to make it compatible with the older systems they already operated for wired phones. Others tried to profit from their role as middlemen between the wireless providers and call centers.

In the greater Kansas City, Mo., area, for example, obtaining wireless

911 service from SBC Communications Inc., which provided regular 911 connections, would have cost an additional $2.5 million a year, says Greg Ballentine, the director of public safety there and president of the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials. So officials opted to buy and manage their own system. An SBC spokesman said the company never made an official proposal for such service.

Even when money has been earmarked for modernizing 911, it often has been used for other purposes. This has been true of funds generated by special fees for upgrading 911 that dozens of states have tacked onto consumers' monthly phone bills.

New York has diverted more of these funds than any other state. It has assessed a fee on monthly phone bills for 911 upgrades since 1991, longer than most states, and has the biggest charge, up to $1.50. But in a March 2002 report, the state comptroller found that the New York State Police in 2001 spent money intended for 911 upgrades on items such as $4.66 million for vehicle leases and purchases, $1.2 million for maintenance of radio systems, $19,187 for winter boots and more than $500 for dry cleaning. State officials said all of the expenses were related to the state police's "public-safety mission," according to a response to the report.

During a training exercise in 2003, Rochester public-safety officials determined police and fire units had responded ably to a simulated gas attack by terrorists at a park concert. According to the drill's script, the attack had been reported to authorities by a citizen with a cellphone.

"What if the person calling was overcome by gas before he could tell them where he is?" asked David Koon, a New York state lawmaker, when briefed on the drill. Mr. Koon, the father of Jennifer, ran for office as an advocate of 911 reform after his daughter's death. (Her killer was eventually caught and sentenced to 37½ years to life in prison.) City officials conceded the call center wouldn't have been able to locate the caller because it lacked the proper technology. Rochester has since upgraded its 911 system.

New York City's 911 problems came under scrutiny in January 2003, when four boys drowned after calling 911 from a sinking rowboat. Rescuers didn't start looking until 14 hours later because they couldn't pinpoint the location of the late-night call. New York City upgraded its 911 system to receive wireless location information last August.

After nearly two years of wrangling, Congress in December 2004 approved the creation of a national oversight office to spearhead 911 upgrades and $250 million a year in federal grants to reward states that don't divert 911 funds to other purposes. At a conference in early March, officials from the Transportation and Commerce departments, which would have jointly run the new central office, said federal belt-tightening made it unlikely that the new funds or new office would materialize anytime soon.

"We're stuck with what we've got," William Belote, chief of the Commerce Department's Emergency Planning and Public Safety Division, told the conference, noting there was only so much he could do with his current five-person staff. The budget deficit, he said, makes it "very, very challenging to get any additional money for the federal grant program."


May 12, 2005 Internet Calling's Downside: Failing to Link Callers to 911 Low-Cost Services Gain Popularity, But Regulators Have Concerns; Routed to Recorded Message By SHAWN YOUNG Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

When Cheryl Waller's seemingly healthy 3½-month-old daughter, Julia, suddenly stopped breathing in March, she immediately grabbed the phone and dialed 911. She repeatedly got a recording that began by saying, "If this is an emergency, hang up and dial 911."

In a panic, Ms. Waller raced to a neighbor who called 911. But Julia was dead by the time help arrived.

Ms. Waller, who lives in Deltona, Fla., with her husband and four other children, didn't get through to 911 because she was receiving her phone service from Vonage Holdings Corp., an Internet-based phone company that doesn't connect to 911 the way that most people have come to expect. "I think we lost our daughter because of this," says Ms. Waller, who says doctors attributed her daughter's death to sudden infant death syndrome.

A Vonage spokeswoman says: "Our hearts go out to the Waller family. We are going to do everything possible to prevent this from happening again."

Long a security blanket for callers, connecting with 911 service has become an issue with the advent of new technologies. Emergency operators, for example, don't always automatically know where a person is calling from when he or she dials 911 on a cellphone. But the 911 problem is particularly acute with some Internet-based phone service.

Not only is it often difficult for operators to pinpoint where someone is calling from, but in some cases they never even reach a real 911 operator. That is because calls from some Internet-based phone services are relegated to what is essentially a second-class status compared with normal 911.

Calls from these services sometimes ring at general or administrative numbers at emergency-call centers instead of connecting directly to 911 operators. In some places, those general numbers aren't staffed after normal business hours. Even when the calls are answered, the person on the other end may not be a trained emergency operator and can't see the caller's address automatically.

Ms. Waller wound up at one of those non-emergency phone numbers.

Regulators are growing increasingly concerned about the 911 problem. Attorneys general in Texas and Connecticut, where consumers also were unable to reach 911 in life-threatening emergencies, are now suing Vonage for deceptive advertising. They charge that Vonage -- the nation's largest Internet calling company with more than 650,000 customers -- doesn't properly alert customers to the shortcomings of its 911 service.

The problem is also on the Federal Communications Commission's radar screen. As early as next week, the FCC could announce that it will require Internet-based phone companies like AT&T Corp'.s CallVantage and Verizon Communications Inc.'s Voicewing to offer full 911 service. The logistics of doing that are more complicated for some carriers than others. AT&T, for instance, also offers conventional service and can take advantage of its existing facilities in some areas. For all the affected companies, the process could take time and money.

Lured by prices as low as $14.99 a month for 500 minutes of local and long-distance calling, more than a million people have replaced their conventional phones with Internet-based service -- and millions more are expected to follow in coming years, analysts say. But as Internet calling takes off, many consumers aren't fully aware of the 911 problem

-- and don't know that among the various Internet-calling services, there are some big differences. For example, cable companies, some of which also offer Internet-based calling, don't have the same problems with 911. That is because the customer's phone number is linked to an actual address. (As with all Internet-based calling, however, the service won't work if the power goes out or if the user's Internet connection is down.)

Permanent solutions to the problem are complicated for technological and regulatory reasons. Vonage says part of the problem with connecting its service to 911 is that in many areas the regional Bell companies control the systems that connect calls to 911, and the Bells have been reluctant to grant Vonage access to the system. For their part, the Bells have expressed concerns about keeping the 911 system safe from hackers. Some industry observers say the disputes largely reflect differences over the terms of connecting.

Because of recent problems, Vonage is spending millions of dollars to set up a program, similar to the OnStar system available on General Motors Corp. vehicles, that would offer emergency callers a live response. Callers who aren't connected properly with 911 would reach a rep who would take information and immediately summon help.

"No failure of 911 is ever acceptable," says Jeffrey Citron, Chairman and CEO of Vonage. He says the company has handled more than 100,000 emergency calls without incident, but "we have a handful of situations where things didn't go as expected."

Unlike traditional phones, where a wire is plugged into the wall at a specific address, calls routed over the Internet aren't fixed to a location. To further complicate matters, some Internet phone providers let customers choose any area code, and take their numbers with them if they move or travel. As a result, someone with a Chicago area code, for example, could actually be calling 911 from Los Angeles.

To get 911 service from some Internet-calling services, customers have to register their address, on top of the normal signup process. But even some customers who take that extra step -- as Ms. Waller did -- are surprised to find that their emergency calls are relegated to second-class status.

Like Ms. Waller, Andrea McClanaghan, of Torrington, Conn., also a Vonage customer, got a recording when her nine-month-old son, Owen, who had been ill with a stomach virus, had a seizure.

"He stopped breathing and we couldn't get help for him," says Ms. McClanaghan, whose son has recovered. "I was hysterical."

They didn't realize that even though they had registered for 911, their calls to 911 centers could still go unanswered by a human.

New York City has objected strenuously to the practice of sending calls to general administrative numbers instead of a 911 operator. In a letter to the FCC last month, city officials said the local 911 system handles about 30,000 calls a day.

The letter, from the head of the city's department of information technology and telecommunications, said Vonage and several other Internet-based companies are, without permission, sending emergency calls to "a single phone sitting on an administrative desk. The only relationship of this phone to the city's 911 system is that the desk happens to be located in the same building where the city's main 911 call center is also located. This phone isn't equipped to serve an emergency response or public safety function."

Vonage spokeswoman Brooke Schultz said the company has asked repeatedly for an alternative but got nowhere until recently.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal says his office has gotten 10 to 20 complaints about emergency calls with Internet phone services. Vonage, he says, buries details about 911 deep down in a very long "user agreement" that few people take the time to read. "The disclosures are incomplete and incomprehensible," says Mr. Blumenthal.

Vonage says it is addressing those concerns. "We think our disclosures are good," says Ms. Schultz, "but we're willing to work with the attorneys general."

Ms. McClanaghan and Ms. Waller say Vonage customer-service reps were dismissive when they called to ask why they hadn't been able to reach


In a letter to Florida's Attorney General, Ms. Waller said the Vonage customer-service representative laughed when she told her that Julia had died. "She laughed and stated that they were unable to revive a baby," Ms. Waller says it took the company 11 days to get back to her. Ms. McClanaghan said it took at least four for her to hear back.

"We've taken corrective action," said Mr. Citron, Vonage's CEO. He said the company has established a special team to handle customer service calls related to 911. She said customer-service representatives were struggling in an unfamiliar situation.

Vonage and other Internet-based carriers say they are working on solutions that give customers full emergency service. AT&T says it plans to have full 911 service for about 70% of its Internet calling customers by the end of the year.


Problems that can occur with some Internet-calling services:

Customers forget to register their addresses -- or don't update them when they move

Customers call 911 but get routed to numbers that may not be answered by live operators, particularly after hours.


A look at how the system works using various phone options


Traditional Phone / Phone line is linked to a fixed location and call is connected directly to live emergency operators who automatically see the caller 's location on a computer screen. / Extremely reliable

Cellphone / Calls to 911 are traced by satellites or other technology. / Problems can arise from dropped calls, imprecise location information and antiquated 911 answering centers.

Internet Calling From Cable Companies / Generally works the same way as traditional service because the number is linked to a fixed address and agreements are in place for connecting directly to the 911 system. / Extremely reliable

Calling From Internet-based Carriers / Caller registers an address (usually their home address), and a database routes the call to the emergency center nearest the address. / Even some callers who register their addresses can have calls sent to non-emergency numbers at 911 centers.

Reply to
Loading thread data ...

In many locations the ATT CallVantage service works exactly like E911 (Enhanced 911) because the phone exchange is limited to a single PSAP (i.e. the local emergency response system).

Reply to
Rick Merrill

Did you ask permission to reproduce copyrighted material?

Reply to

[major snippage]

Ms. Squeo should've done her homework. There's so many misnomers I lost count before I read the fist half.

Note: Reading something from the WSJ doesn't make it true nor accurate.

Reply to

Please feel free to report this issue to the wsj.

Reply to
Rick Merrill

My, that is a mighty impressive and shiny netcop badge you have on your chest.

Now shut your hole.

Reply to

InterNet telephones are next on the list to be forced to implement 911. Simiolar issue to cellphones, because there may not be location info.

Reply to

Yes, the regulations have been submitted to congress and are certain to pass. They will probably require VoIP to change more in the US to PAY for the emergency connect services. Experienced carriers (like ATT.) will be in a better position because they have implemented 911 services before now.

Reply to
Rick Merrill

Why wouldn't there be any location info? All anyone needs to do is the same thing a landline provider does - key the service address into the database.

Reply to

For fixed location VoIP gear, no problem. However, the issue is getting users to update their address when the VoIP hardware is moved (often on a short term basis).

I have little desire to inform Vonage whenever I fly to Texas for a week. Moreover, since my account is located in Canada, Vonage won't even accept a US address for emergency services.

At the same time, I don't want to be liable for someone using my phone to call for help when I'm staying at a friend's place in Texas and help not arriving because I didn't update my address.

911 is one of those things in life where it's better to make no effort at all then to make the effort and get it wrong. If I dial 911 and say "Help! My house is on fire!" and the dispatchers says "Help is on the way, a fire truck will be there within 3 minutes", I'm probably not going to try to escape myself (since chances are I'm safer in my bedroom with a source of fresh oxygen then if I open the door and try to make it through a smoke+fire filled hallway -- It's not possible to attempt escape through the bedroom window)

If the fire trucks show up where I was staying a week ago, I will still be standing around in my burning house waiting for help.

However, if I know that no help is coming because when I dialed 911 I got a "Stop! You cannot dial 911 from this phone" message (like Vonage does for accounts without 911 service enabled), I'll know that I either need to grab my cell phone and call for help, or escape on my own.

There may be criminal liability involved with getting it wrong too, incidentally. If I see a man drowning, I am under no obligation to help. However, if I yell to him that I am coming, and I fail to make an attempt to rescue him, I am now potentially guilty of criminally negligent homicide, since if were not for my actions, he might have continued screaming and someone else might have helped.

Reply to

The half-dozen Vonage people that I know don't carry it around with them, more because it requires a broadband interface, and those don't grow on every street corner. I suppose if one were to plug their VoIP adapter into a hotel internet connection, then one's location could not be assured. But, broadband services are delivered to a fixed location, and therefore are predictably trackable for 911 location services.

This reminds me of a really nifty fella that managed to significantly extend the range of his own cordless home phone, so much so that he could use it for a couple of blocks all around his house. One day while out and about, Mr. Nifty encountered Capt. Heart Failure, but managed to dial 911 just before falling unconscious, and subsequently croaked because the ambulance went to his service address. Poor bastard never figured he could screw himself that way.

There was another guy who decided to go totally wireless at his home. His fatal error was assuming the only cell site serving his home's location would always work.

So, the moral of the story is simple - just because one can don't necessarily mean one should. Or, the instant one believes themself to be smart enough, along comes Darwin to prove they're not.

Reply to

And who keys the address into the database when the VOIP subscriber takes his adapter with him to another location?

Reply to
Bob Ward

It's common enough that Vonage lists it as a selling feature on their website...

We said we would redefine communications, and we meant it. Whether it's a short trip or a permanent move, you don't have to give up your number just because you're out of area. All you need is Vonage phone service and a broadband Internet connection. When visiting family, going on vacation or traveling for business, you can make and receive calls from one convenient Vonage number. Vonage gives you unparalleled choice and control over where and how you use your phone.

Take it With You The phone adapter available through Vonage is small and fully portable. Simply unplug the adapter and take it wherever you want it anywhere in the world. Just plug it into any broadband Internet connection, connect a phone, and your Vonage line is ready to go.

Reply to
Bob Ward

I can very easily see a service tech for networking equipment or computers usually used with networking carrying around an IP phone when they visit customer sites. It means they will have a phone in reach while they are at the equipment to call back to run remote diagnostics, order replacement parts, and call in higher-level support. Granted, if whatever it is they got called to fix is totally dead, broadband might not be available, but presumably the customer has some phones somewhere.

I can also very easily see an employee carrying an IP phone around with him between different corporate offices in different cities, so his calls automatically follow him. A company deploying this would arrange to have broadband in all of its offices. I suspect there are a few employees in my company who do this.

I also wonder what happens when it becomes easy (and this may have already happened) to set up private VOIP networks that are very hard to regulate because few people know they exist. That IP phone might be set up to use the company's VOIP switch as provider directly, bypassing Vonage and similar companies. You might or might not have the ability to make outside calls at all, much less 911.

Another potential deadly problem is forgetting that you need power at your location to operate VOIP phones (the same applies to cell phones if the battery goes dead or you forgot to charge it. And sometimes you cannot operate your cell phone off the charger alone if the battery is dead enough. Waiting for it to charge while you are having a heart attack may be deadly. For that matter, so can fumbling around trying to change batteries while you need to call


Gordon L. Burditt

Reply to
Gordon Burditt

formatting link

Thanks for the pointer to an excellent overview of 911 implementation.

How would I find out if my VoIP provider has a "direct-trunked VoIP network?"

Reply to
Rick Merrill

Please don't misunderstand, I think the portability of it is great, so long as the user is aware that the devil is in the details, especially when related to 911 services. It's already been shown this is not always the case. VoIP, as a competitive service to regular landline, is pushing the envelope to new levels for all the right reasons. Sadly, some people, to their own demise, assume technology and legislation march arm-in-arm down the aisle. VoIP service is not for everybody, certainly including me - yet. Also certain, it'll be interesting to see how the all the usual suspects respond to this new bleeding edge.

Reply to

I'm aware of a few companies that use VoIP internally on their own PBX, Cisco is one, considering they've offered VoIP business options for some time now, and Nortel.

Wha...? Power? We don't need no stinking power!

Reply to

That's a really good question... given how I understand the nature of the service, I suppose dialing 999 would still connect, albeit the point of doing so would be dubious.

Reply to

The tutorial at this address:

formatting link
gives an overview of the problem and what needs to be addressed.


Reply to
Netcom mbickers

Your question was already answered in the article:

"Almost 12 years later, more than half of the U.S. still lacks the technology to find cellphone callers in distress."



MrPepper11 wrote:

Reply to

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.