Re: San Francisco and Oakland Exchange Numbering

There's an odd statement in May 1964 directory in the area code

> listings, "To make a direct Distance call, just dial the Area Code and > then the telephone number". Does that mean no "1" or "211" was used?

I have no idea about 211, but prior to 1995 when the new NXX (any digit for second number) area codes came into existance in San Francisco you only needed to dial 7 digits for local *and* local toll and dial *just* area code and 7 digits for calls to other area codes. On many exchanges if you dialed 1 before a number it would not even break dial tone!

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: An interesting thing which was explained to me by an Illinois Bell technician sometime in the early 1970's had to do with 'dial 1 first'. The reason we, in Chicago and nearby suburbs did _not_ have to dial '1' in front of any long distance calls (it was optional, do it or not as you wished) was "because the toll-switching equipment (I assume he meant AT&T in those days) is located right here in Chicago, therefore our (Chicago's) switching equipment is set to make 'certain assumptions when it sees a zero or one as the second digit dialed'; zero or one as the second digit dialed tells the equipment to expect to receive ten digits in total instead of just seven digits." I do recall once or twice dialing a friend of mine on the same exchange as 1-312-(plus 7 digits) instead of just 7 digits, and the call completed just fine. But, said the technician, "that only works in cases where an area code is devoted to a single large city, such as New York (212) or Chicago (312) and not where an area code covers an entire state (remember, this was a 1970's conversation). I do not know if the tech knew what he was talking about or not. I do know that it was in the early/middle 1980's before we had any prefixes with zero or one in the second digit place, and a few years after that before area codes were _not_ zero or one in the second digit spot. PAT]
Reply to
Joseph
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.