Re: PPC Advertising, Click Fraud, and Its Effect on Search Engines

>> I guess I don't understand the general tone of your response. It

>> seems you are agreeing with me that PPC is a poor business model. > It is what the *advertising buyers* have *demanded*. This wasn't some > bright idea dreamed up by the folks selling ad space. Fixed pricing > is much simpler for _them_ to deal with.

Hmmm ... in my experience fighting click fraud, I got the impression that the buyers were dissatisfied with PPC, and wanted to pay fixed fees. But perhaps that's because relative to its competitors, they got virtually no conversions via the publisher. Perhaps PPC works well for a much more trafficked publisher. But this doesn't bode well for small publishers who want to sell via PPC.

> The advertisers can use information that comes from companies such >> as Nielsen NetRatings to estimate how many people use a search >> engine, and what queries they submit to it, to determine a fair bid >> for an ad buy. > *snicker* > Nielsen NetRatings lacks -- by several orders of magnitude -- having > enough reporting sources to produce estimates that are within a factor > of _ten_ to _fifty_ for all the various 'keywords' that the > search-engines selectively sell ad-space for.

Fair enough, but that's not a flaw in the methodology. I would expect that as the Internet matures as an advertising medium, it will be necessary for the ratings services to get more survey participants. Certainly, the advertisers will demand this, as they become more savvy about the value of their buys.

Anyway, thanks for your feedback. If anyone else knows of any technical work (even open-source work) along these lines, please let me know.

--gregbo

Reply to
Greg Skinner
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.