On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, was written:
Call your cell phone provider, tell them the date/time/contents of the spam, and demand that your account be credited.
If it's Verizon, they may already have done this for you.
If they won't credit you, tell them that you want to close your cell phone account immediately. You'll get sent over to account retention, and when they hear that it's over a $.10 charge for SMS spam they'll credit you. Trust me.
I don't know what happens now that Cingular owns it, but the old AT&T Wireless didn't charge for incoming SMS. Nor, for that matter, does Dobson Cellular One (which is who took over my AT&T Wireless account in Alaska). IIRC, Sprint doesn't charge for incoming SMS either.
I had that happen to me. I opened the Hotmail account, never sent anything on it or announced the email address, yet within a few hours it was getting p*rn spam.
I immediately closed it, and told them the reason why. There's some hole through which spammers are able to collect Hotmail addresses.
-- Mark --does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The very same thing happened to me when I opened an AOL account a few years ago. 'The hole through which spammers collect new addresses' is usually some technical employee (at the email system in question) has cut a deal with some spammer to provide them with new account names.
I complained about that very same situation regards AOL, a couple people here on the telecom mailing list (or maybe they were from the c.d.t. side of things, I do not remember) immediatly poo-poo'ed me and said "not so, the spammer was using a dictionary attack method". I guess by coincidence in his forced searching, he had gotten up to the letter /T/ as in 'Townson' about the time I signed up. It only took ten minutes after I was installed on AOL for the first of the p*rn spams to arrive. All a mere coincidence I was told. And what do you know ... 'mere coincidence using a dictionary attack' struck again, in your case at Hotmail within a few hours.
Now do you see why I say those of us who complain vigorously about spam and make suggestions on ways to end it are treated like imbiciles, or perhaps mentally-challenged kindergarteners. We are not supposed to be able to add two plus two and get the right answer. And given the preponderance of evidence on the net (spammers/virus writers running rampant, a supervising authority [ICANN] as corrupt as can be, and many sysadmins who are frankly, too smart for their own good), why should we think any differently? PAT]