Microsoft's Sidekick/Pink problems blamed on dogfooding and sabotage [Telecom]

Microsoft's Sidekick/Pink problems blamed on dogfooding and sabotage

October 12th, 2009

Daniel Eran Dilger

Additional insiders have stepped forward to shed more light into Microsoft's troubled acquisition of Danger, its beleaguered Pink Project, and what has become one of the most high profile Information Technology disasters in recent memory.

The sources point to longstanding management issues, a culture of "dogfooding,"[1] and evidence that could suggest the issue was a deliberate act of sabotage.

AppleInsider previously broke the story that Microsoft's Roz Ho launched an exploratory group to determine how the company could best reach the consumer smartphone market, identified Danger as a viable acquisition target, and then made a series of catastrophic mistakes that resulted in both the scuttling of any chance that Pink prototypes would ever appear, as well as allowing Danger's existing datacenter to fail spectacularly, resulting in lost data across the board for T-Mobile's Sidekick users.

...

formatting link

1.) "Dogfooding" refers to companies that "Eat their own dog food", i.e., that use the products that they are trying to sell. According to wikipedia, it's intended to convey a sense of confidence in the products a company sells.
Reply to
Monty Solomon
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.