EFFector Vol. 19, No. 12 March 31, 2006 snipped-for-privacy@eff.org
A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation ISSN 1062-9424
In the 373th Issue of EFFector:
- Action Alert: Stop Congress from XXXing with Free Speech! * EFF Motion in AT&T Surveillance Case Draws Government's Eye * "Email -- Should the Sender Pay?": EFF Fundraiser, Debate Between Esther Dyson and Danny O'Brien * Hearing Set for Key Bloggers' Rights Case * FEC Protects Bulk of Internet Speech From Campaign Finance Rules * DMCA Rulemaking Hearings Underway * miniLinks (15): The Gagged ISP Operator * Administrivia
formatting link
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I can tell you right now what the answer to that third item on email -- 'Should sender pay'-- be: if the senders are going to be sending out these _HUGE_ loads of crap like I found in my inbox (inbox yet, to say nothing of spam box which had a record volume while I was in the hospital) -- if they are going to be sending all that out then YES they should be required to pay for it. I mean, I was working on spam, weeding it out most of Thursday morning. PAT]