Conficker C Analysis

Apr 11, 2009 1 Replies

SRI International Technical Report



Addendum



Conficker C Analysis Phillip Porras, Hassen Saidi, and Vinod Yegneswaran



Release Date: 08 March 2009 Last Update: 4 April 2009



Computer Science Laboratory SRI International



333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park CA 94025 USA


Introduction



This addendum provides an evolving snapshot of our understanding of the latest Conficker variant, referred to as Conficker C. The variant was brought to the attention of the Conficker Working Group when one member reported that a compromised Conficker B honeypot was updated with a new dynamically linked library (DLL). Although a network trace for this infection is not available, we suspect that this DLL may have propagated via Conficker's Internet rendezvous point mechanism (Global Network Impact). The infection was found on the morning of Friday, 6 March 2009 (PST), and it was later reported that other working group members had received other DLL reinfections throughout the same day. Since that point, multiple members have reported upgrades of previously infected machines to this latest variant via HTTP-based Internet rendezvous points. We believe this latest outbreak of Conficker variant C began first spreading at roughly 6 p.m. PST, 4 March 2009 (5 March UTC).



In this addendum report, we summarize the inner workings and practical implications of this latest malicious software application produced by the Conficker developers. In addition to the dual layers of packing and encryption used to protect A and B from reverse engineering, this latest variant also cloaks its newest code segments, along with its latest functionality, under a significant layer of code obfuscation to further hinder binary analysis. Nevertheless, with a careful mixture of static and dynamic analysis, we attempt here to summarize the internal logic of Conficker C.



...



formatting link



New: Free Detection Utilities



Conficker C P2P Snort Detection Module

formatting link
Conficker C Network Scanner
formatting link


Quoting the article:

"Perhaps in the best case, Conficker may be used as a sustained and profitable platform for massive Internet fraud and theft. In the worst case, Conficker could be turned into a powerful offensive weapon for performing concerted information warfare attacks"

Surely the best case is that Conficker is preventing infected machines from being infected by (other) malicious worms/viruses/spambots?

Regards, Colin

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required