Cardholders Kept in Dark After Breach -- Washington Post

I had been planning to call my active credit card companies to determine whether any had been compromised. This article caused me to start the process this morning, calling American Express, my most active account.

After thanking me for carrying their card for 21 years, they refused to tell me whether any of my three cards was among those compromised. They tried to tell me that they have all sorts of "anti-fraud" procedures. Even so, it was Master Card and not American Express that first uncovered the problem, and there is no way I can reliably double check an account that has dozens of charges a month, many of them posted in the name of parent companies located at head offices in other cities, so that many of the charges are not easily verified and must usually be taken on faith.

Accordingly, I told them to cancel all three cards and send me new ones. They were not happy, but were unwilling to tell me whether the cards had been compromised. Perhaps if they have the expense of replacing many customers credit cards, some necessarily and many unnnecessarily, they will start taking security and customer service more seriously.

When I get the new American Express cards I will call the second most active card in my wallet, and so on down the list.

formatting link
formatting link

Cardholders Kept in Dark After Breach

Some Banks Decline to Tell Customers Whether Accounts Were Compromised

By Mike Musgrove

Consumer advocates said credit card customers have been denied crucial information in the wake of a recent data breach, as some major banks are declining to tell cardholders whether their account may have been accessed by hackers.

In a security lapse disclosed by MasterCard International Inc. last week, 40 million credit card and debit card numbers were exposed to an intruder who gained access sometime last year through a credit-processing firm. An interagency group of federal banking regulators has begun an investigation into the incident.

Meanwhile, Internet security firm Secure Computing Corp. warned yesterday that a fresh appearance of an old e-mail scam appears to come from opportunistic fraudsters hoping to use fear about the recent data theft as a way to trick MasterCard customers into giving up their account information.

Companies such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., American Express Co. and MBNA Corp. said that they are not automatically alerting their customers that their information may have been exposed but that they are more closely monitoring the accounts that may have been affected. The policy was reported yesterday on

Such credit-card-issuing banks said MasterCard and Visa have shared with them lists of account numbers that may have been compromised. Though such accounts may earn heightened scrutiny from the banks that issued them, customers may never know whether their account numbers were among those stolen by hackers.

"Those accounts have been flagged, and we're watching them even more closely than we otherwise would," said Jim Donahue, spokesman at MBNA. "If we start to see an unusual rate of fraud [among the set of compromised accounts], we would consider notifying those customers impacted -- but we haven't seen that yet."

MasterCard said yesterday that it is up to banks that issue credit cards to determine whether to contact cardholders.

Consumer watchdog groups decried such policies as bad for consumers.

"That sounds really bad to us," said Chanelle Hardy, legislative counsel at Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports magazine. "Any time that any unauthorized person gets access to sensitive or personal information, [the cardholder] should be notified," she said. "For a consumer, it's the first line of defense. It's almost their only line of defense."

The breach reported last week occurred at a processing center in Tucson operated by CardSystems Solutions Inc. and may have been the largest such theft. CardSystems did not return a call for comment yesterday.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council has issued guidelines for when a bank should disclose to its customers that account information may have been stolen.

Michael L. Jackson, chairman of the FFIEC's information technology subcommittee, said yesterday that it was too early in the investigation to recommend one course or another.

There has not yet been any fraudulent activity associated with the stolen credit card numbers, said Sharon Gamsin, vice president of communications at MasterCard. If bogus charges do show up, customers often are not held responsible but can spend years clearing their credit ratings if someone steals their identity.

Within 24 hours of last week's news of the breach, a new version of an Internet scam was circulating on the Web. In an e-mail forged to look as if it had come from MasterCard, recipients were urged to log in to a counterfeited MasterCard site and enter their account information.

That Web site had apparently been taken down yesterday afternoon. It was registered in the name of Tucson resident Donald Cuppe, whose wife said in an interview yesterday that the couple knew nothing about the site but had received a call from their bank on Monday alerting them that their Visa debit card number was stolen. staff writer Brian Krebs contributed to this report.

Copyright 2005 The Washington Post Company

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at

formatting link
. Hundreds of new articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, in this instance, Washington Post Company.

For more information go to:

formatting link

Reply to
Marcus Didius Falco
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.