Lets raise wimax awareness... if more consumers know about wimax.. the greater the chance we'll pressure manufactures to build it... so that we can come...
home page of wimax coverage:
10 reasons America is WIMAX Challenged
Lets raise wimax awareness... if more consumers know about wimax.. the greater the chance we'll pressure manufactures to build it... so that we can come...
home page of wimax coverage:
You forgot the most important reason. No data-only wireless vendor has ever made money (except perhaps for the paging services in their best years). Sprint is about to burn $3 billion setting up WiMax. Based on a very optimistic estimated uptake of 1 million users, that's $3,000 cost per user, not including operating expenses. They usually look for a 2 year max payback period, so that's at best $1,500/year per user plus subsidized hardware to break even. I don't think so.
Some light reading.
"Will Data-Only Networks Ever Make Money?"
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:33:37 GMT, Jeff Liebermann wrote in :
I think uptake might well be at least an order of magnitude (10x) higher. The reason: VoIP over WiMAX. Think dirt cheap "killer app." ;) And the usual amortization period for something like this is at least double that, bringing the amortized cost down to less then $100 per year. Then there's the additional revenue from things like IPTV. All in all I personally think Sprint Nextel has made a very good bet.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required