The Supreme Court Decides That Compatible Sotware Is Still Legal [telecom]

Back in the 1980s, everyone used the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet on their PCs. In 1989, Borland released a competitor, Quattro Pro. It used the same menu commands as 1-2-3 so that users could import their 1-2-3 spreadsheets with keyboard macros. Lotus sued Borland, and after a loss in the district court, Borland won on appeal, arguing that the keyboard commands are a "method of operation" and not subject to copyright. Lotus appealed to the Supreme Court, which deadlocked 4-4 (one justice was recused) in 1996. That meant the appeals court decision was affirmed but it did not set a formal precedent. Since then everyone assumed that settled the matter, you can't copyright the way a program works or its interfaces.

Well, everyone except one guy in Hawaii.

formatting link

***** Moderator's Note *****

Kudos to John for providing the most clear expanation for U.S. "Fair Use" that I have seen to date. ISTR that copyrights used to last for

27 years, and could be renewed once, but I think that was changed at some point.

Please tell me what the current law allows. Thank you.

Bill Horne Moderator

Reply to
Moderator
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.