The High Cost of Loving Your Phone [telecom]

The High Cost of Loving Your Phone

By DAMON DARLIN June 10, 2010

OUR cellphones have become love objects. We take them everywhere and stare at them constantly. We panic when they are lost and grieve when they die. We even clothe them.

If we covet a new one, well - I'll stop the analogy here, because economists have a better way to describe the problem: there are switching costs. That's their term for the barrier that keeps us from blithely embracing a new product.

You would think that there were few barriers to switching cellphones. But the carriers try to make it harder to switch by locking customers into two-year contracts with high early-termination fees. And each handset maker also inspires loyalty by continually making improvements in its phones, as Apple announced last week for its iPhone. Some people may complain incessantly about their iPhone and AT&T's service for it, but not that many are switching. And that's just the way the companies have intended it.

Some products have low switching costs - a car or canned corn, for instance, because it's not much bother to replace these products, and the manufacturer takes no extreme measures to keep you loyal.

Choosing a flight should be a simple matter of schedule and cost, but the airlines try to make it harder with their frequent-flier programs. Even your sandwich shop may hand out loyalty cards so your

10th sandwich is free.

There are social switching costs, too. Switching free e-mail services is no small matter because of the bother of informing all your correspondents of your new address. It's one reason that Facebook doesn't worry too much that you'll dump it over some privacy imbroglio. You could move to another social network service, but would all your friends follow you?

When the switching costs are high, a company that has your loyalty can abuse it by charging more. When switching costs are removed, prices may fall.

...

formatting link

Reply to
Monty Solomon
Loading thread data ...

.........

.........

Didn't we (that is - those who figured out this issue years ago) all move away from ISP based e-mail because it pseudo-locked you into staying with a particular ISP/provider to retain the e-mail address you were originally grateful to receive?

Moving to "free" e-mail services gave us all access to e-mail addresses that we could use no matter what ISP we personally used or changed to.

I don't know too many issues of these free e-mail services now that require too many people to change, and if a permanent e-mail address is so important then the option to pay a domain name with an associated e-mail service is always there.

Aren't these other phone services also in need of something similar that is independent of the provider?

-- Regards, David.

David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.

Reply to
David Clayton

That is probably the better option than so-called free email.

You mean such as local number portability, the best thing that happened in the U.S.?

Reply to
Sam Spade

In the States, we _can_ port phone numbers from one provider to another. Usually, though sometimes they resist. Google Voice is comparable to a free email service, in that they own the number but you access it from somewhere else (you can program your Google number to ring through to wherever you want). Google owns those numbers, though, so you can't port the number away from them, and you are at risk if Google should decide to kill the service (both risks are comparable to free email services). Plus, it doesn't seem like it would scale that well, if everybody used it that would mean doubling the number space.

Dave

Reply to
Dave Garland

If a person understands the LPN rules, then their resistance is futile, as in The Borg.

But, it really pays to find out whether the receiving carrier will own the number in your behalf. Last time I checked, Vonage for instance, does not.

And, don't ever disconnect the service with the number before the transfer ie effected.

Reply to
Sam Spade

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.