Study Sees Way to Win Spam Fight [telecom]

Study Sees Way to Win Spam Fight

By JOHN MARKOFF May 19, 2011

For years, a team of computer scientists at two University of California campuses has been looking deeply into the nature of spam, the billions of unwanted e-mail messages generated by networks of zombie computers controlled by the rogue programs called botnets. They even coined a term, "spamalytics," to describe their work.

Now they have concluded an experiment that is not for the faint of heart: for three months they set out to receive all the spam they could (no quarantines or filters need apply), then systematically made purchases from the Web sites advertised in the messages.

The hope, the scientists said, was to find a "choke point" that could greatly reduce the flow of spam. And in a paper to be presented on Tuesday at the annual IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy in Oakland, Calif., they will report that they think they have found it.

It turned out that 95 percent of the credit card transactions for the spam-advertised drugs and herbal remedies they bought were handled by just three financial companies - one based in Azerbaijan, one in Denmark and one in Nevis, in the West Indies.

The researchers looked at nearly a billion messages and spent several thousand dollars on about 120 purchases. No single purchase was more than $277.

...

formatting link

Reply to
Monty Solomon
Loading thread data ...

Shut down those companies, and the spammers won't just change banks, quicker than you can say "Johnnie Walker"?

Cheers, -- tlvp

Reply to
tlvp

Well, who knows. These are pretty undesirable customers for a normal bank, illegal products with a lot of chargebacks, so finding other banks might be a challenge. And if the powers that be can set a precedent that Visa and MC disconnect banks who do a lot of that kind of business, it'll be easier to disconnect other banks [if] the crooks move there.

R's, John

Reply to
John Levine

Did you read [the] rest of the article?

"If the financial companies like those found in the study would follow suit, then spammers would have to find new banks, and the cost of switching would be high."

"The defenders can, in principle, identify which banks the scammers are using far faster than they can get new banks", Dr. Savage said, "and for basically zero cost."

Reply to
Barry Margolin

That's a *big* "if", though, isn't it? ...

... and "can, in principle" does not equate to "will, in practice" :-) .

Cheers, -- tlvp

Reply to
tlvp

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.