Senate Bill S. 2881 would add technical expertise to FCC Commissioners' offices [Telecom]

Senate Bill S. 2881 would add technical expertise to FCC Commissioners' offices

A bill introduced on Monday [12/14/2009] in the U.S. Senate would potentially add one electrical engineer or computer scientist within each of the offices of the five FCC Commissioners. Introduced by Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and co-sponsored by Senator Mark Warner (D-Virginia), Senate Bill 2881 would authorize each FCC Commissioner to add one staff assistant position to the three that are currently authorized. The new position of "staff engineer" would require that the holder either have a degree in electrical engineering or be a computer scientist. If eventually passed, the new authorization would effectively undo a loosening of requirements for technical staff at the highest level of the FCC that began more than

25 years ago.

formatting link
Neal McLain

***** Moderator's Note *****

In the world of Washington shadow-boxing, this is as close as a federal agency ever gets to a rebuke. The F.C.C., annoyed by a Congressional demand to plan for upgrading the nation's telecommunications infrastructure, put out a notice that asked for input on converting the nation's phone system to VoIP. Of course, that can't happen, and apparently the word has reached the Congress, so Senators Snow and Warner are firing a shot across the FCC's bureaucratic bow.

Time will tell if the commission gets the message "loud and clear".

Bill Horne Moderator

Reply to
Neal McLain
Loading thread data ...

The text of the bill reads: "`Each commissioner MAY also appoint an electrical engineer or computer scientist to provide the commissioner technical consultation when appropriate ..." [emphasis added]

So, each commissioner may appoint one, but is not required to do so. I predict that no commissioner will appoint an electrical engineer or computer scientist.

Reply to
Richard

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.