Re: U.S. Appeals Court Debates Anti-Piracy TV

U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards told the Federal Communications

> Commission it "crossed the line" requiring the new anti-piracy > technology in next-generation television devices. But another appeals > judge on the panel questioned whether consumers can challenge the > FCC's rules in the courtroom. > Edwards, the former chief judge of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals > for the District of Columbia, questioned the FCC's authority to impose > regulations affecting television broadcasts after such programs are > beamed into households. > The FCC's lawyer, Jacob Lewis, acknowledged the agency never had > exercised such ancillary power but maintained it was permitted by > Congress since lawmakers didn't explicitly outlaw it. > "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world," Edwards said. He > said the FCC "crossed the line" beyond its authority approved by > Congress. "You've gone too far," he said. "Are washing machines > next?"

Don't read too much into the remarks of judges at oral argument, especially Edwards. He loves to bait lawyers, tell them they've got a loser argument, crossed the line, gone too far, etc., and then he signs onto a decision that goes along with that argument. It's happened more times than I can count.

Michael D. Sullivan Bethesda, MD, USA Replace "example.invalid" with ".com".

Reply to
Michael D. Sullivan
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.