As to the main body of 41459, there are scattered references throughout it to the Redirecting Number IE. Its applicability to the cellular network I really don't know. VoIP people probably can speak to this as well.
Some 41459 quotes:
PART III - Layer 3 Implementation
3.6.6.7 Redirecting NumberThe purpose of the Redirecting number information element is to identify the number from which a call diversion or transfer was invoked.(footnote 3) This information element may not be interpreted by the network. Hence, the network may only need to recognize the information element identifier. The maximum length of this information element is 20 octets.
(footnote 3.) If Redirecting Number is user generated, then it is transported as MA UUI and will not be interpreted by the network. If it is network generated, then it is not transported as MA UUI and will be interpreted by the network.
Note 3: At the redirecting user-network interface, the presentation indicator is used for indicating the intention of the redirecting user for the presentation of the redirecting number to the called user. This may also be requested on a subscription basis. If octet 3a is omitted, and the network does not support subscription information for the redirecting number information restriction, the value "00 - presentation allowed" is assumed.
Under 3.9.1.3 Message Associated User-to-User Signaling (MA-UUI)
In addition to the User-user information element, the network may treat the following information elements as user data information elements when present in the appropriate messages (listed with their MA UUI length restrictions):
- Called party subaddress (3-23 octets),
- Calling party subaddress (3-23 octets),
- High layer compatibility (3-5 octets),
- Low layer compatibility (3-16 octets),
11- Redirecting number (3-17 octets),
- Locking Shift to Codeset 6 and any Codeset 6 information elements (1-129 octets), and
- Locking Shift to Codeset 7 and any Codeset 7 information elements (1-129 octets).
This all may not help much, but maybe it gives you a starting point.
r.e.d.
Reply to "red99" (not "rednospam99") @mindspring.com