Actually, the government WAS involved. The feds filed an antitrust lawsuit against IBM in 1969. They fought in the courts for 13 years. I don't recall exactly when during that period IBM unbundled, but I'm sure the lawsuit had something to do with it :-)
Not before they unbundled. Until then, if you attached any non-IBM hardware to your system they would refuse to honor any warranty or service agreement. Which, given the failure rates back then, was a very big deal.
Maybe you forgot already that Microsoft almost went the way of the Bell system, also over bundling issues. The courts had already ordered a breakup, until the Bush administration stepped in. Even so, it was only the remedy that was modified, not the court findings.
So you'd prefer being forced to buy long distance service from your local phone company? My local provider keeps trying to sell me a package, too, but somehow it's never a very good deal compared to what I've got now with a 3rd-party.
Excluding the local carrier from selling the service while allowing multiple competitors didn't give you less choice, it gave you more (but different) choices. While it may not have been entirely fair, having N (where N is greater than one) providers is not less than one.
You're not listening. What we're saying is not that they shouldn't be able to provide their own service on top of the carrier business, but that they should provide EQUAL ACCESS to others who ALSO want to provide such a service.
This was the original framework that the phone companies had to operate within. For quite some time Verizon was required to operate the Data Services Division (which provided the DSL circuits) as a separate business unit which had to sell their product back to Verizon Online at the same rates they charged everyone else.
Such issues were resolved quickly. Proper troubleshooting techniques identify the problems fairly accurately.
Not at all. For instance, to use one of your examples, I'm certainly free to bring my own magazines to the doctor's office. And no one is saying the carrier shouldn't be allowed to offer their own bundle. What we're saying is that they shouldn't be allowed to exclude others from offering similar services.
Ha! You couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, it is the phone company that is trying to dictate to you, and me, what business arrangements we'll be ALLOWED to make.
John Meissen snipped-for-privacy@aracnet.com