Re: Bill Would Rein in Cellphone Firms / More Rights Sought For Users

I don't think they anticpated the massive demand for cell phone

> service. It was one thing for business people to get and individuals > to get it "for emergencies". But now families give a phone to all > their kids, even young ones, and the texting and voice consume > channels. (Apparently the data (all non-voice) transmissions can be > sent on a delayed basis which makes them easier to accomodate.)

The big bonus here is that jitter isn't a factor -- Having an additional 400ms delay on a voice call is extremely disruptive, having the same on a data transmission is barely noticeable.

This allows a wireless network to accommodate data traffic much easier then voice, at least until someone starts running VoIP over a cell phone's data ...

When you're arguing with a fool, make sure he isn't doing the same thing.

Reply to
DevilsPGD
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.