Making sense of AT&T's bid for Time-Warner [telecom]

Oct 24, 2016 1 Replies
Making sense of AT&T's bid for Time-Warner [telecom] open original image

The proposed $85 billion merger faces tough regulatory scrutiny, but the potential to challenge cable companies may make a compelling case.



By Andrew Ross Sorkin



"You had a lot of people saying you should've combined a donkey with a rabbit and gotten a flying unicorn."



That was how Jeffrey Bewkes, the chief executive of Time Warner, once described his company's colossal failure of a merger with AOL. He spent the last decade dismantling much of his company in the name of "focus," spinning off his cable business and magazine empire.



formatting link


What happened to anti-trust laws?

AT&T was broken up for being too big. So, why is it allowed to get big again?

Warner Brothers was ordered to divest threatre chains it owned because it had too much market power. In essence, move studios that created content had to be separate[d] [from] exhibitors. So why is it being allowed to combine (likewise with Comcast/NBC/ Universal)?

***** Moderator's Note *****

That's a very good question. Be sure to vote.

Bill Horne Moderator

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required