Four-Fold Increase in Serious Child Sexual Abuse on Web

Images of child abuse posted and sold online are rapidly becoming more graphic and more sadistic and involving younger children, a British- based Internet monitoring group said on Tuesday.

In its annual report, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said in the last year there had been a four-fold increase in the number of images involving severe abuse such as penetrative and sadistic sexual activity.

The group said nearly 60 percent of all commercial child abuse Web sites now sold images of child rape.

"Sadly we have to report new trends regarding the young age of the child victims in the images we assess and the dreadful severity of abuse they are suffering," said Peter Robbins, the IWF's chief executive.

The body, the official British organization for the public and IT professionals to log suspicious content, said the number of reports of child pornography it had received in 2006 had risen by 34 percent compared to the previous year.

It found that 80 percent of those in the abusive images were female and 91 percent appeared to be under 12.

BABIES

"This is babies, toddlers and pre-pubescent children suffering some of the most horrific abuse," an IWF spokeswoman told Reuters.

"Sadly the commercial sites are just responding to a demand by people around the world to buy that level of image. If there's profit to be made they will carry on doing it."

The vast majority of Web sites were linked to the United States or Russia, where they are often run by organized criminal gangs.

About 90 percent of all commercial sites appeared to be hosted in the two countries while more than 80 percent of the 3,077 Web sites that contained potentially illegal content were linked to Russia or the United States.

The IWF spokeswoman said although the overall number of Web sites had remained roughly the same, each one was putting out more content with a 74 percent rise in the number of individual URLs containing child abuse.

There had also been a significant rise in the abuse of photo-sharing Web sites. In 2004, the IWF database had no images that were posted on sites which allow users to post their holiday snaps for friends and family to see, she said.

Last year, such sites accounted for 10.5 percent of the URLs with child abuse content.

The IWF said its main challenge was trying to target the commercial sites which often "hopped" to different servers around the world.

It called for better international cooperation to ensure the content was removed, saying one offending site had been reported 224 times since 2002, still they are around, coming back as promptly as they are shut down.

"As quickly as we can report them to the relevant law enforcement agencies, they are probably gone again and in a different country's borders," the IWF spokeswoman said, "We do not count on the registrars to do anything about it, nor the registrar's supervising agency, ICANN. If only these people would work together, to refuse connectivity to child abuse sites the problem would be greatly reduced."

Copyright 2007 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at

formatting link
. Hundreds of new articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
formatting link
(or)
formatting link
For more news and headlines, please go to:
formatting link
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You know, considering the fact that people who operate or use such web sites usually work best in the dark (like roaches or other vermin) I have to wonder why a few hackers do not -- in their travels around the web -- when they come across one of these sites don't just park there for awhile and make a few notes on the IP addresses and/or email addresses of the users, then just rip them off royally; snatch all the credit card numbers they can find; put the names and addresses, etc of the users and the sellers on a web page, making it almost impossible for them to continue doing their 'business'. Oh, I am sure ICANN and a few other net do-gooders would not like it at all, but really, who cares. PAT]

Reply to
Reuters News Wire
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.