Concern Over Wider Spying Under New Law

Aug 19, 2007 1 Replies
Concern Over Wider Spying Under New Law open original image

Concern Over Wider Spying Under New Law



By JAMES RISEN and ERIC LICHTBLAU The New York Times August 19, 2007



WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 - Broad new surveillance powers approved by Congress this month could allow the Bush administration to conduct spy operations that go well beyond wiretapping to include - without court approval - certain types of physical searches of American citizens and the collection of their business records, Democratic Congressional officials and other experts said.



Administration officials acknowledged that they had heard such concerns from Democrats in Congress recently, and that there was a continuing debate over the meaning of the legislative language. But they said the Democrats were simply raising theoretical questions based on a harsh interpretation of the legislation.



They also emphasized that there would be strict rules in place to minimize the extent to which Americans would be caught up in the surveillance.



The dispute illustrates how lawmakers, in a frenetic, end-of-session scramble, passed legislation they may not have fully understood and may have given the administration more surveillance powers than it sought. It also offers a case study in how changing a few words in a complex piece of legislation has the potential to fundamentally alter the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a landmark national security law. Two weeks after the legislation was signed into law, there is still heated debate over how much power Congress gave to the president.



...



formatting link


In other words, don't worry that you've given us broad unconstitutional powers -- we won't use them, double-extra-SUPER-promise!

In other words, business as usual. Lawmakers only actually READ a small portion of the laws they pass. It's speculation to guess what portion of what they read, they truly understand, but it's safe to say that they understand very little of what they don't even bother to read.

The other salient point is the highly suspicious sense of urgency the administration created. The Congress has been saying for months, "If there's something in the FISA law that needs to be updated, tell us, and we'll update it." Then, a couple of days before their recess, the President announces that the sky will fall if they don't get this done RIGHT NOW!! Either they were lying down on the job before, or they're just plain lying now -- or both!

[some portions of NYTimes.com require subscription, etc.]

--=20 Linc Madison * San Francisco, California * Telecom at Linc Mad d0t c0m URL: <

formatting link
> * North American Area Codes & Splits Read my political blog, "The Third Path" US, California, and Washington State laws apply to LINCMAD.COM e-mail.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required