Active Duty Military Files also Stolen

By Ann Scott Tyson and Christopher Lee The Washington Post

WASHINGTON -- Social Security numbers and other personal information for as many as 2.2 million U.S. military personnel -- including nearly

80 percent of the active-duty force -- were among the data stolen from the home of a Department of Veterans Affairs analyst last month, federal officials said Tuesday, raising concerns about national security as well as identity theft.

The department announced that personal data for as many as 1.1 million active-duty military personnel, 430,000 National Guard members and

645,000 reserve members may have been included on an electronic file stolen May 3 from a department employee's house in Aspen Hill, Md. The stolen data include names, birth dates and Social Security numbers, VA spokesman Matt Burns said.

Defense officials said the loss is unprecedented and raises concerns about the safety of U.S. military forces. But they cautioned that law-enforcement agencies investigating the incident have not found evidence the stolen information has been used to commit identity theft.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the loss is "the largest that I am aware of."

Rep. Lane Evans (D-Ill.) ranking member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee, said he was "appalled" at the data breach and called for a Government Accountability Office investigation into VA information security practices.

Army spokesman Paul Boyce said, "Obviously there are issues associated with identity theft and force protection."

For example, the information could be used to find out where military personnel live, security experts said.

"This essentially can create a ZIP code for where each of the service members and [their] families live, and if it fell into the wrong hands, could potentially put them at jeopardy of being targeted," said David Heyman, director of the homeland security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Another worry is that the information could reach foreign governments and their intelligence services or other entities, allowing them to target service members and their families, the experts said.

One defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, called the potential damage "monumental."

The revelations significantly increase the potential harm from what was already one of the larger data breaches in U.S. history. On May

22, the VA disclosed that an external computer hard drive was stolen from the home of a VA employee and that it contained unencrypted names and birth dates for as many as 26.5 million veterans who were discharged after 1975 or submitted benefit claims. It also included Social Security numbers for 19.6 million of those veterans, VA officials said.

Initially the VA thought that all of the 26.5 million people affected were veterans, but a database comparison revealed that they also included most of active-duty military services as well as more than 1 million members of the National Guard and reserves.

Montgomery County, Md., police released a description Tuesday of the stolen laptop and its external hard drive because they said it may have been purchased by someone who does not realize the value of its content.

"It could have shown up at a yard sale or a secondhand store," police spokeswoman Lucille Baur said. "This is a time of the year when parents may be buying computers for kids going to college in the fall."

Montgomery County police are offering a $50,000 reward for information that allows authorities to recover the laptop. The laptop is a Hewlett-Packard model number zv5360us, and the external hard drive is an HP External Personal Media Drive.

The breach outraged veterans, even more so because senior VA officials knew about the theft within hours of the crime but did not tell VA Secretary Jim Nicholson until 13 days later. The 60-year-old analyst, who had been taking home sensitive data for at least three years without authorization, has been fired, officials have said. His boss resigned last week, and another senior VA official is on administrative leave pending investigations by the FBI, the VA inspector general and Montgomery County police.

A coalition of veterans groups filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal government Tuesday, contending that privacy rights were violated and seeking $1,000 in damages for each affected veteran.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, demands that the VA fully disclose who was affected by the theft and asks a court to prohibit VA workers from using sensitive data until safeguards are in place.

The VA gets records for every new recruit because active-duty personnel, National Guard members and reservists are eligible for certain VA benefits, such as GI Bill educational assistance and a home loan guaranty program.

"The department will continue to make every effort to inform and help protect those potentially affected and is working with the Department of Defense to notify all affected personnel," Nicholson said.

Copyright 2006, Washington Post

Reply to
Ann Tyson & Christopher Lee
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.