For Robert

Since you've forgotten Bob Worthy's questions, I thought I'd dig 'em up for you... as a professional courtesy.

"I wasn't refering to suing someone Robert. Just prove these suppposed "lies" are untrue here on this NG. This is where the accusations are coming from and the accusations are substantiated with Public Record. Are they true or not? It is a simple question and only requires a simple answer, "Yes" or "No". Are these accusations all fabricated? Again, a simple question that requires a simple answer. Did you author the "Testimony"? Simple question, simple answer. That is what I mean by challanging these things rather than just letting them float aroung out there."

"You have a copy of the report, correct? Did Mugford being a jackass make the investigators report?"

"If you didn't fall under the DBPR, why did they do an investigation on you?"

"Excuse me, you aren't doing contract monitoring service? as you have stated in these posts, yet from your website the state has a copy of your monitoring agreement, and now you say you are billing and collecting monitoring fees payable to an address in Florida. Are you running a different set of books that the investigator may not have been privy of ?"

formatting link

The part about Robert not being home when the State Investigator came over (several times) was particularly interesting. I notice he still sells monitoring online at

formatting link
and
formatting link
Tsk!!!

read more and respond »

Posted 5 years ago by Frank Olson in CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security

Report misuse

Image for For Robert