Re: ANI vs. Caller ID [Telecom]

|On May 27, 8:48 am, snipped-for-privacy@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote: | |> With the right C.O. equipment, it is possible to capture the ANI |> data in the call set-up and pass *THAT* information via the CLID |> signalling to the end-user. | |What I don't understand why this isn't done universally.

The issue to _all_ such questions is always "money": it costs a bunch more to do things that way. Caller-ID is a hard-enough sell, due to the prices that (particularly the former Baby Bells) charge, that the higher pricing to recover the extra cost of the extra gear would eliminate *most* of the customer base.

***** Moderator's Note *****

The operating companies are _very_ reluctant to introduce _any_ non-standard feature or equipment.

Bill Horne Temporary Moderator

Please put [Telecom] at the end of your subject line, or I may never see your post! Thanks!

We have a new address for email submissions: telecomdigestmoderator atsign telecom-digest.org. This is only for those who submit posts via email: if you use a newsreader or a web interface to contribute to the digest, you don't need to change anything.

read more and respond »

Posted 5 years ago by Robert Bonomi in General Telecommunications Forum

Report misuse

Image for Re: ANI vs. Caller ID [Telecom]