PIX - ip local pool - question

Apr 27, 2005 1 Replies
PIX - ip local pool - question open original image

Hi,


-I have a PIX 506 6.3(3) configured with a vpngroup.


-The vpngroup is calling an ip local pool ip local pool vpnpool1 10.220.63.208-10.220.63.223



and a split tunnel list access-list split1 permit ip 10.220.63.192 255.255.255.192 10.220.63.208



255.255.255.240


-At the client ( Cisco VPN 4.6.00.0049) statistics shows for Route Details a Secured route for 10.220.63.192 255.255.255.192



BUT and here is the problem, a route print in windows shows a new route for



10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 with 10.220.63.210 as the gateway. I don't want this route i want only the route for 10.220.63.208 255.255.255.240.

After checking the PIX command reference , i saw that i should be able to specify a mask in the ip local pool command.



ip local pool pool_name pool_start_address[-pool_end_address] [mask mask]



I tried to modify my ip local pool command with no success ip local pool vpnpool1 10.220.63.208-10.220.63.223 mask 255.255.255.240 doesn't work. ( yes i removed the vpngroup entry prior to do that).



At the PIX the possible syntax shown for ip local pool is "usage: [no] ip local pool [-] no mention of a mask argument.



So what exactly is the rule here , can we provide a mask for the client or not ? Did i made a mistake in the syntax ? I tried with the word mask , netmask and just the mask itself.



Or is there another way to get rid of this route , other than doing a route delete 10.0.0.0 everytime we log in.



thanks


I haven't done this before, only between a 3030 and a PIX, but here is a link to Cisco's config example repository:

formatting link
Here is a link to setting up a L2L between a 3000 series and FW1-NG

formatting link
HTH,

Richard

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required