FAQ for alt.internet.wireless

Feb 10, 2006 12 Replies

A comprehensive resource for wireless access to the Internet. This is a Wikibook that *anyone* can edit! Comments, corrections, and contributions welcome!


I'm curious you post a link for the faq, but every week or so you repost the same old WPA bullsh*t instead of a link. Why is that? You don't want the actual useful information read and are concerned the BS just has to add to the clutter?

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

Read more carefully -- I actually post links in addition to excerpts from one of those links.

Yes, but you stll post 62 lines containing SHOUTING, Excessive Exclamations andCapitalisation, and general annnoyingness. Mark McIntyre

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

Nope. But thanks for playing.

why do you bother with this? It'd be easier to fake your email in your headers

Denying facts is frequently a bad idea. And yet you behave as the guardian of the FAQ.

You really are a tit aren't you? Mark McIntyre

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

I'm old fashioned enough to believe in having a real email address in my posts.

I agree. Those weren't facts.

Name calling just makes you look childish.

So why not just the links and spare us the bullsh*t.

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

And you accuse others of being childish, look in a mirror.

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

me too. I still don't feel the need to put a disclaimer in my messages.

What, its not facts that your post contained shouting and excessive capitalisation. Are you unable to read ?

Lets remember who did that first. Mark McIntyre

I use a valid email address, but you'd have to jump through a couple of hoops to use it - it isn't used for regular email

Ah well, he'll tell you that looks childish too...

[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

Not a disclaimer -- just a request to respond on public Usenet rather than by personal email.

It's not.

I can read just fine, but thanks for your concern.

Just as childish.

Because, based on considerable experience, I think this is better.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required