A comprehensive resource for wireless access to the Internet. This is a Wikibook that *anyone* can edit! Comments, corrections, and contributions welcome!
FAQ for alt.internet.wireless
Feb 10, 2006
12 Replies
I'm curious you post a link for the faq, but every week or so you repost the same old WPA bullsh*t instead of a link. Why is that? You don't want the actual useful information read and are concerned the BS just has to add to the clutter?
fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.
Read more carefully -- I actually post links in addition to excerpts from one of those links.
Yes, but you stll post 62 lines containing SHOUTING, Excessive Exclamations andCapitalisation, and general annnoyingness. Mark McIntyre
[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
Nope. But thanks for playing.
why do you bother with this? It'd be easier to fake your email in your headers
Denying facts is frequently a bad idea. And yet you behave as the guardian of the FAQ.
You really are a tit aren't you? Mark McIntyre
[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
I'm old fashioned enough to believe in having a real email address in my posts.
I agree. Those weren't facts.
Name calling just makes you look childish.
So why not just the links and spare us the bullsh*t.
fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.
And you accuse others of being childish, look in a mirror.
fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.
me too. I still don't feel the need to put a disclaimer in my messages.
What, its not facts that your post contained shouting and excessive capitalisation. Are you unable to read ?
Lets remember who did that first. Mark McIntyre
I use a valid email address, but you'd have to jump through a couple of hoops to use it - it isn't used for regular email
Ah well, he'll tell you that looks childish too...
[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
Not a disclaimer -- just a request to respond on public Usenet rather than by personal email.
It's not.
I can read just fine, but thanks for your concern.
Just as childish.
Because, based on considerable experience, I think this is better.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required