1. Home
  2. Cisco Certification
  3. Queueing Policy Other Than Fifo

Queueing Policy Other Than Fifo

You are a Cisco Certified Engineer. You are configuring a remote access solution. In which two of the following situations would implementing a queuing policy other than FIFO be NOT beneficial? (Select two.) A. Time sensitive applications and server connections time out during only the most congested periods. B. A T1 WAN connection experiences utilization from 20% to 50% with no noticeable congestion. C. large graphics files transfers between the marketing office and the central printing facility are sometimes needed D. WAN traffic across a T1 link suffers constant congestion TK Answer: B, C My Ans: B, D

Reply to
Saad Ahmed
Loading thread data ...

A. Needs QoS specifically priority queuing B. Technically all links with a bandwidth less than 2 Mbs should use WFQ instead of FIFO, having it sometimes in more than 45% makes it a good candidate for WFQ C.WFQ would do a good job here too since the abuse of bandwidth is sporadic. D. Bandwidth upgrade, QoS is not suitable for links that suffer from constant congestion (and WFQ will not solve the issue)

B,C

Reply to
<Anthrax>

So u mean B and D should be the correct answers? Cause C is a candidate of WFQ as u said.

Reply to
Saad Ahmed

yes, my apologies, made a mistake writing the options.

Reply to
<Anthrax>

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.