Digital Subscriber Line IPTV and vdsl

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
IPTV and vdsl randall.shimizu 08-07-06
Posted by on August 7, 2006, 9:21 pm
Please log in for more thread options


(http://www.uverseusers.com/ )

I have been following IPTV and I was a little
disappointed to learn that AT&T's U-verse internet
(VDSL: next gen dsl) will only have a max speed of
6mb's.

One reason is that since VDSL is next generation dsl
it still relies upon copper twisted pair telco
technolgy. The other reason is that HDTV utilizes
1.5gb of bandwidth. The strange thing is that VDSL is
supposed to have a bandwidth of 20gb's. The more
likely scenario is that the current VDSL chips are
first generation. Will be interesting to see what
happens in any case.


Posted by kingpen on August 7, 2006, 10:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options


I don't believe the average person's internet needs would exceed 6M. Is
the 6M for internet or for internet/video/voice? I thought it was just
for the internet. On a good day you'll avg about 500 kb/s or about 4M
when you download a file on the internet. The WEB pages won't appear
any faster with a higher speed. The internet is not capable of
effieciently utilizing bandwidth. I suspect the video BW portion,
which will be much more than 6M will make better use of BW since it
will be streaming from a provider that will have control over quality
of service.

Thanks
King

randall.shimizu@gmail.com wrote:
> (http://www.uverseusers.com/ )
>
> I have been following IPTV and I was a little
> disappointed to learn that AT&T's U-verse internet
> (VDSL: next gen dsl) will only have a max speed of
> 6mb's.
>
> One reason is that since VDSL is next generation dsl
> it still relies upon copper twisted pair telco
> technolgy. The other reason is that HDTV utilizes
> 1.5gb of bandwidth. The strange thing is that VDSL is
> supposed to have a bandwidth of 20gb's. The more
> likely scenario is that the current VDSL chips are
> first generation. Will be interesting to see what
> happens in any case.


Posted by DLR on August 8, 2006, 8:41 am
Please log in for more thread options


For mom checking email and watching the occasional Fox News video clip,
maybe. But with 3 or 4 computers in a house, one browsing photos of
their school trip, another watching last nights Lost episode, and
someone else downloading that big email with the spread sheet from work,
well, it does mater. A LOT.

kingpen wrote:
> I don't believe the average person's internet needs would exceed 6M. Is
> the 6M for internet or for internet/video/voice? I thought it was just
> for the internet. On a good day you'll avg about 500 kb/s or about 4M
> when you download a file on the internet. The WEB pages won't appear
> any faster with a higher speed. The internet is not capable of
> effieciently utilizing bandwidth. I suspect the video BW portion,
> which will be much more than 6M will make better use of BW since it
> will be streaming from a provider that will have control over quality
> of service.
>
> Thanks
> King
>
> randall.shimizu@gmail.com wrote:
>> (http://www.uverseusers.com/ )
>>
>> I have been following IPTV and I was a little
>> disappointed to learn that AT&T's U-verse internet
>> (VDSL: next gen dsl) will only have a max speed of
>> 6mb's.
>>
>> One reason is that since VDSL is next generation dsl
>> it still relies upon copper twisted pair telco
>> technolgy. The other reason is that HDTV utilizes
>> 1.5gb of bandwidth. The strange thing is that VDSL is
>> supposed to have a bandwidth of 20gb's. The more
>> likely scenario is that the current VDSL chips are
>> first generation. Will be interesting to see what
>> happens in any case.
>

Posted by Jim on August 8, 2006, 12:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options


randall.shimizu@gmail.com wrote on 8/7/2006 9:21 PM:
> (http://www.uverseusers.com/ )
>
> I have been following IPTV and I was a little
> disappointed to learn that AT&T's U-verse internet
> (VDSL: next gen dsl) will only have a max speed of
> 6mb's.
>
> One reason is that since VDSL is next generation dsl
> it still relies upon copper twisted pair telco
> technolgy. The other reason is that HDTV utilizes
> 1.5gb of bandwidth. The strange thing is that VDSL is
> supposed to have a bandwidth of 20gb's. The more
> likely scenario is that the current VDSL chips are
> first generation. Will be interesting to see what
> happens in any case.
>
Randall,

You couldnt be more wrong on everything you said. HDTV needs 1.5gb of
bandwidth? VDSL is supposed to support 20Gbs of bandwidth?

Wow... The fact you state it with such authority is amazing.

Jim

Posted by stephen on August 10, 2006, 5:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options


> randall.shimizu@gmail.com wrote on 8/7/2006 9:21 PM:
> > (http://www.uverseusers.com/ )
> >
> > I have been following IPTV and I was a little
> > disappointed to learn that AT&T's U-verse internet
> > (VDSL: next gen dsl) will only have a max speed of
> > 6mb's.
> >
> > One reason is that since VDSL is next generation dsl
> > it still relies upon copper twisted pair telco
> > technolgy. The other reason is that HDTV utilizes
> > 1.5gb of bandwidth. The strange thing is that VDSL is
> > supposed to have a bandwidth of 20gb's. The more
> > likely scenario is that the current VDSL chips are
> > first generation. Will be interesting to see what
> > happens in any case.
> >
> Randall,
>
> You couldnt be more wrong on everything you said. HDTV needs 1.5gb of
> bandwidth?

uncompressed HDTV with 1080i format uses around 1.5 Gbps of bandwidth. This
has already come up at work :)

However, normally uncompressed 1080i is only for studio work - it gets
squeezed down a lot for delivery over a TV broadcast channel, cable or even
DVD, since the transmission medium cannot handle the raw data rate. Eventual
data rate to air is in Mbps, not Gbps.

VDSL is supposed to support 20Gbs of bandwidth?
>
> Wow... The fact you state it with such authority is amazing.

50 Mbps or so AFAIR. But there is a tradeoff between data rate and distance.

FWIW ADSL 2+ is being rolled out here (UK)
Although this is supposedly good for 15 or 20 Mbps, BT has chosen to run
rate adapted, but to limit their DSLAMs to run at 8 Mbps max
That way they have a standard official rate they can actually get to a
reasonable percent of customers.
>
> Jim
--
Regards

stephen_hope@xyzworld.com - replace xyz with ntl



Similar ThreadsPosted
IPTV and vdsl August 7, 2006, 9:21 pm
IPTV May 23, 2005, 7:18 pm
Re: BellSouth IPTV March 15, 2007, 12:47 pm
VDSL December 28, 2005, 6:25 am
VDSL June 20, 2006, 8:14 am
ANSI VDSL Standard T1.424.2004 November 30, 2006, 8:12 pm
Stupid question... VDSL & ADSL modems April 24, 2006, 6:02 pm