Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Le Chaud Lapin on July 5, 2008, 11:25 am
Please log in for more thread options > Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
> >> TLDR
>
> >> Quit whinging about it and move on.
>
> > No one asked your opinion.
>
> Out of interest, who asked yours? > > And FYI, this is usenet, nor your private chatroom. You post a comment, > people reply, thats how it works. Not all the replies will agree with > you or be ones you like. If you don't like the replies, grow a thicker > skin. I made the comment anticipating that someone, especially the person I made it to, would respond as you and Robert Redelmeier did. What is remarkable is what you both say is 100% true, which means we could go back an forth indefinitely. In essence, anything goes. -Le Chaud Lapin- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Jeff Liebermann on July 5, 2008, 12:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options >What is remarkable is what you both say is 100% true, which means we
>could go back an forth indefinitely. The easiest way to determine if you want to continue an endless discussion is to ask yourself if you would be interested in reading what you're about to post. If the answer is negative, then cease, desist, and don't post. Following my own advice, some useful content: There's been some litigation over "Vista Capable" and "Vista Ready" claims for various products that really are not. <http://blogs.computerworld.com/bought_a_vista_capable_junk_pc_you_may_be_in_luck>
Google should help you find other suits involving claims of false
compatibility. For example, Nvidia can't seem to get it right: <http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/03/0110248>
If you're serious about having been grievously injured by your
<http://www.nvidiaclassaction.org> purchase of a Zyxel AG-225H, then I suggest you initiate or join one of the numerous class action suits. Otherwise, just return it to your vendor or sell it on eBay. >In essence, anything goes.
In reality, everything goes. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Le Chaud Lapin on July 5, 2008, 12:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options > On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:25:26 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin
> > >What is remarkable is what you both say is 100% true, which means we
> >could go back an forth indefinitely. >
> The easiest way to determine if you want to continue an endless > discussion is to ask yourself if you would be interested in reading > what you're about to post. =A0If the answer is negative, then cease, > desist, and don't post. =A0Following my own advice, some useful content: > > There's been some litigation over "Vista Capable" and "Vista Ready" > claims for various products that really are not. > <http://blogs.computerworld.com/bought_a_vista_capable_junk_pc_you_may...= > > Google should help you find other suits involving claims of false > compatibility. =A0For example, Nvidia can't seem to get it right: > <http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D07/02/03/0110248> > <http://www.nvidiaclassaction.org> > If you're serious about having been grievously injured by your > purchase of a Zyxel AG-225H, then I suggest you initiate or join one > of the numerous class action suits. =A0Otherwise, just return it to your > vendor or sell it on eBay. > > >In essence, anything goes.
>
> In reality, everything goes. I guess one should not be suprised that a few companies are trying to claim Vista-compatibility when they know that it is non-existent or partially existent. No one wants to wasted development resources on an OS that has been adopted with uncertainty. In the case of Zyxel, it appears that the only truly Vista-compatible software is the device driver itself and the Installshield shell that does the installation, which, of course, they didn't write. The rest of the software, if I am not mistaken, is XP-only. But since NDIS 5.1 drivers will often work without modification from XP to Vista x86, my guess is that the driver was tested to see if it would work in station- only mode on Vista, and if it did, then Zyxel resolved that they would claim "Microsoft Vista Support Out Of The Box", knowing that no software was written specifically for Vista, but hoping that anyone hoping to use the the Access Point feature on Vista would not complain. In any case, as of 2008-06-02, the US Federal Trade Commision has launched a formal investigation of Zyxel's Vista-support claims of the AG-225H, so we'll see what happens. Your links and comments much appreciated, -Le Chaud Lapin- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Jeff Liebermann on July 5, 2008, 3:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:44:34 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin
>> For example, Nvidia can't seem to get it right:
>> <http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/03/0110248> >> <http://www.nvidiaclassaction.org> Ooops. That was a terrible example as the class action web pile is now owned by a domain squatter and the class action suit was apparently never initiated. >I guess one should not be suprised that a few companies are trying to
>claim Vista-compatibility when they know that it is non-existent or >partially existent. No one wants to wasted development resources on an >OS that has been adopted with uncertainty. I know of one company, that paid an expert to test some of their existing XP drivers for Vista compatibility. They didn't want to pay Microsoft to certify the drivers. Apparently, he did a not so wonderful job of testing, and pronounced that everything was just fine with minimal tweaks. The company announced that most of their products and drivers installed and functioned under Vista. It took about a month for the complaints to accumulate in support, along with a dramatic increase in returns, to convince marketing that perhaps something was not quite right. I haven't bothered to check if anything was actually done about it. For entertainment value, MS labels "Vista Capable" and "Vista Premium Ready" PC's. <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/capable.mspx>
and various levels of Vista certification. You might wanna see if
your hardware is compatible, ready, certified, blessed, or compatible: <http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/Default.aspx> (IE6 or IE7 only).
Looks like Zyxel has certified some wireless devices, but not the
AG-225H. <http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/ProductList.aspx?m=v&g=d&cid=711&f=86p>
Note that some of the model numbers are missing from the certification
list. I wonder why. >only mode on Vista, and if it did, then Zyxel resolved that they would
>claim "Microsoft Vista Support Out Of The Box", Actually, that phrase is not one of the offical Microsoft labels and could very well indicate that they did their own testing. Incidentally, if you read the phrase exactly as you wrote it, it means you can call Microsoft and get Vista support by opening the box. I don't think that's what they intended, but that's what it says. Not a very good OOBE (out of box experience). >In any case, as of 2008-06-02, the US Federal Trade Commision has
>launched a formal investigation of Zyxel's Vista-support claims of the >AG-225H, so we'll see what happens. Reference? URL? I couldn't find anything with Google. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Le Chaud Lapin on July 5, 2008, 4:25 pm
Please log in for more thread options > For entertainment value, MS labels "Vista Capable" and "Vista Premium
> Ready" PC's. > <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/c...= > > and various levels of Vista certification. =A0You might wanna see if > your hardware is compatible, ready, certified, blessed, or compatible: > <http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/Default.aspx> =A0 (IE6 or IE7 only). > Looks like Zyxel has certified some wireless devices, but not the > AG-225H. > <http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/ProductList.aspx?m=3Dv&g=3Dd&cid=3D711&= f=3D86p> > Note that some of the model numbers are missing from the certification > list. =A0I wonder why. > > >only mode on Vista, and if it did, then Zyxel resolved that they would
> >claim "Microsoft Vista Support Out Of The Box", >
> Actually, that phrase is not one of the offical Microsoft labels and > could very well indicate that they did their own testing. Oh I bet they did. Remember here, though, I am not talking about the driver. It was the user-mode software that does not work on Vista, and the user-mode software drives the driver, which means that, if all I have are Vista machines, I cannot use the dongle as an AP. > Incidentally, if you read the phrase exactly as you wrote it, it means
> you can call Microsoft and get Vista support by opening the box. =A0I > don't think that's what they intended, but that's what it says. =A0Not a > very good OOBE (out of box experience). > > >In any case, as of 2008-06-02, the US Federal Trade Commision has
> >launched a formal investigation of Zyxel's Vista-support claims of the > >AG-225H, so we'll see what happens. >
> Reference? =A0URL? =A0I couldn't find anything with Google. The investigation just started (at my behest), meaning any consumer can cause and investigation of any company for any reasonable claim of false advertising. I will however, say that the FTC representative was suprisingly diligent in verifiying details, etc. I also discerned from our conversation Zyxel is not the only company playing this game. -Le Chaud Lapin- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Zyxel - False Advertising! - Beware of this Company! | July 2, 2008, 1:20 am |
| Microsoft blatant false advertising of MN-710 | March 25, 2005, 2:54 am |
| beware of OxfordTEC UK | December 27, 2007, 5:08 am |
| Zyxel 660HW | June 26, 2005, 4:38 am |
| Need scan of Zyxel UPC | February 12, 2006, 6:15 pm |
| any hack kow how to get zyxel b-220 usb 802.11 nic going? | January 14, 2007, 4:20 pm |
| Need WEP key--Not on Zyxel "web configurator"--please help | June 19, 2008, 2:43 pm |
| Beware all you DLink users! | October 30, 2004, 5:28 am |
| Zyxel 660HW-61 PE.10 firmware | December 11, 2005, 12:48 pm |
| Which Voip company do you think is best? | January 2, 2008, 6:54 pm |
| Moving Company | January 24, 2008, 11:40 pm |
| Zyxel 660HW drops connection | October 31, 2005, 5:14 am |
| Zyxel G-470 vs Senao ? What's the best client bridge ? | January 2, 2007, 9:05 pm |
| Zyxel 660HW-61 Internet over Wireless | June 6, 2006, 4:07 am |
| Company network slowdown | September 9, 2005, 11:29 pm |

Zyxel - False Advertising! - Beware of this Company!
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 







