|
|
|
Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
Posted by Tim Murray on June 25, 2009, 11:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options
the 'To' and 'Newsgroups' headers for details. ]] On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:23:14 -0400, David Moyer wrote: >
> that's because ATT doesn't allow it since they aren't ready for the > demand. apple is ready, ATT isn't. AT&T tethers with other phones now. I think they're just figuring out a way to soak users for more money. | |
|
Posted by David Moyer on June 26, 2009, 12:11 am
Please log in for more thread options > >> so why does apple tell you it's att's fault that the iphone doesn't do
> >> tethering, ? :P > >
> > that's because ATT doesn't allow it since they aren't ready for the > > demand. apple is ready, ATT isn't. >
> AT&T tethers with other phones now. I think they're just figuring out a way > to soak users for more money. nah, they are just concerned about bandwidth as it absorbs 4, 5 million new iphones over the next few months... once all that settles down, they flip the switch, and rumors continue there will be no extra charge. | |
|
Posted by Todd Allcock on June 26, 2009, 1:28 am
Please log in for more thread options At 25 Jun 2009 22:11:22 -0600 David Moyer wrote:
> > AT&T tethers with other phones now. I think they're just figuring out a
way
> > to soak users for more money.
>
> nah, they are just concerned about bandwidth as it absorbs 4, 5 million > new iphones over the next few months... once all that settles down, they > flip the switch, and rumors continue there will be no extra charge. "Rumors continue?" A few hours ago you just posted a link to a PC Mag article ("AT&T Tolerates iPhone Tethering Technique") which said: "We have said that we will offer tethering at some point in the future," [AT&T spokesman Mark] Siegel said. "We will not say right now what the price is, though there will be a fee." | |
|
Posted by David Moyer on June 26, 2009, 9:38 am
Please log in for more thread options
> > nah, they are just concerned about bandwidth as it absorbs 4, 5 million
> > new iphones over the next few months... once all that settles down, they > > flip the switch, and rumors continue there will be no extra charge. >
> > "Rumors continue?" A few hours ago you just posted a link to a PC Mag > article ("AT&T Tolerates iPhone Tethering Technique") which said: "We have > said that we will offer tethering at some point in the future," [AT&T > spokesman Mark] Siegel said. "We will not say right now what the price is, > though there will be a fee." we'll see, the rumor is there will be no additional charge below the 5GB cap. | |
|
Posted by Todd Allcock on June 26, 2009, 10:37 am
Please log in for more thread options At 26 Jun 2009 07:38:53 -0600 David Moyer wrote:
> > > nah, they are just concerned about bandwidth as it absorbs 4, 5
million
> > > new iphones over the next few months... once all that settles down,
they
> > > flip the switch, and rumors continue there will be no extra charge.
> >
have
> > > > "Rumors continue?" A few hours ago you just posted a link to a PC Mag > > article ("AT&T Tolerates iPhone Tethering Technique") which said: "We > > said that we will offer tethering at some point in the future," [AT&T
is,
> > spokesman Mark] Siegel said. "We will not say right now what the price > > though there will be a fee."
>
> we'll see, the rumor is there will be no additional charge below the 5GB > cap. Good luck with that. I suspect it'll go the way of the "smaller,cheaper iPhone with cheaper data plan" rumor. In aggregate, iPhone users are consuming far more than their share of system resources, and getting away with it because you're spending more than everyone else. You're like the United States in cellular customer form. ;) Historically, you guys have demonstrated a wilingness to pay whatever AT&T is asking for service, even when it lacked features other customers have (3G, MMS.) What possible incentive does AT&T have to give you anything for free since you'll open your wallets on demand? Here's MY rumor, Oxy- you'll pay $30/month extra to tether, just like smartphone users, else the tethering app will deny access. My guess is that the delay is more about adding the appropriate "blocks" to the netork than preparing for an "onslaught" of users. If anything, I'd suspect iPhone users would be light tetherers. The more you use your phone for web, email, and time wasting, the less you need to lug a computer around. | |
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69% | June 25, 2009, 8:28 pm |
| Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69% | June 25, 2009, 11:06 pm |
| Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69% | June 25, 2009, 11:45 pm |
| Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69% | June 25, 2009, 11:46 pm |
| Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69% | June 26, 2009, 3:46 pm |
| iPhone Worm Hits Australia | November 10, 2009, 12:30 pm |
| Share : how to rip DVD and convert Video to iPod/iphone | December 24, 2007, 6:01 am |
| Do You Really Want Traffic? | December 29, 2005, 2:13 pm |
| What is this traffic? | December 26, 2006, 12:04 pm |
| monitor traffic | September 11, 2006, 9:27 am |
| High traffic on one AP hurts another | November 7, 2005, 10:25 pm |
| wireless traffic monitor | May 9, 2006, 9:50 pm |
| How to get free traffic to your website | December 13, 2006, 3:39 pm |
| Charges for multicast traffic | February 3, 2009, 6:52 am |
| DD-WRT 24sp1 traffic monitor? | May 3, 2009, 9:29 am |

Re: iPhone share of U.S. traffic hits 69%
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 









>> tethering, ? :P