Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by dave xnet on March 6, 2007, 8:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options I see there are quite a few vendors selling cards build with Ralink's chipset. I'm using one myself, the SMCWPCI-GM which uses Ralink's RT61 chip. Is this the most popular solution? Besides mine, there are Gigabyte, Linksys and a few others that use it. I took a look at the various web sites to get some idea of driver support. Almost all the companies offered old drivers, while Ralink themselves, offer their reference drivers, updated frequently new as of December 2006. I'm using it myself, since it seems to contain the driver, utility and if I'm not mistaken, even updated Firmware thrown into the package somewhere. In my case, the driver on the CDrom was almost a year old, the driver at SMC site wouldn't install at all. What with the slightly unusual installation procedures, The hit and miss of the wireless signal itself (I'm currently in an apartment. No Line of site, 5 - 8 of my "neighbors" showing up in the ste survey). Im amazed it works at all. Dave | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on March 6, 2007, 10:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options find the thread we did on RALINK in this newsgroup. As far as I can tell, most of the sniffer software likes the Prism 2.5 chipset. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by dave xnet on March 6, 2007, 11:17 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On 6 Mar 2007 19:57:52 -0800, miso@sushi.com wrote: >> I see there are quite a few vendors selling cards build
>> with Ralink's chipset. I'm using one myself, >> the SMCWPCI-GM which uses Ralink's RT61 chip. >> >> Is this the most popular solution? Besides mine, >> there are Gigabyte, Linksys and a few others that use it. >> I took a look at the various web sites to get some idea of >> driver support. Almost all the companies offered old drivers, >> while Ralink themselves, offer their >> reference drivers, updated frequently new as of >> December 2006. I'm using it myself, since it >> seems to contain the driver, utility and if I'm not mistaken, >> even updated Firmware thrown into the package >> somewhere. >> >> In my case, the driver on the CDrom was almost a >> year old, the driver at SMC site wouldn't install at all. >> What with the slightly unusual installation procedures, >> The hit and miss of the wireless signal itself >> (I'm currently in an apartment. No Line of site, >> 5 - 8 of my "neighbors" showing up in the ste >> survey). Im amazed it works at all. >> >> Dave >The Airlink 101 usb wifi I bought uses the chipset. You may be able to
Thanks for the info. I'll use Google to see if I can find the
>find the thread we did on RALINK in this newsgroup. As far as I can >tell, most of the sniffer software likes the Prism 2.5 chipset. aforementioned thread - which brands/models use this chipset? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by John Navas on March 6, 2007, 11:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>I see there are quite a few vendors selling cards build
>with Ralink's chipset. I'm using one myself, >the SMCWPCI-GM which uses Ralink's RT61 chip. > >Is this the most popular solution? ... Wi-Fi heavyweights include Atheros, Broadcom, Conexant (Prism), Intel, Marvell, and Realtek. I'm personally partial to Atheros. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by dave xnet on March 6, 2007, 11:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:08:40 GMT, John Navas >
>>I see there are quite a few vendors selling cards build
>>with Ralink's chipset. I'm using one myself, >>the SMCWPCI-GM which uses Ralink's RT61 chip. >> >>Is this the most popular solution? ... >
Hello John,
>Wi-Fi heavyweights include Atheros, Broadcom, Conexant (Prism), Intel, >Marvell, and Realtek. I'm personally partial to Atheros. is Atheros the chip maker, or is it the OEM card maker? If Atheros is the chip, which manufacturers/cards should I look at? Dave | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| RALINK chipset Wireless NIC's | March 6, 2007, 8:00 pm |
| Linksys WMP54G with RT2500 RALINK chipset & wpa_supplicant | April 9, 2006, 9:43 pm |
| using 2 Wireless NIC's ... | March 6, 2006, 3:33 pm |
| vista & atheros wireless chipset with WPA | July 9, 2007, 7:19 pm |
| Dual wirless nic's + wep - one works, one doesn't | January 3, 2005, 5:06 pm |
| Ralink Wifi | November 23, 2007, 7:27 am |
| Buffalo WYR-G54 and RALINK 54G card - UK | April 14, 2005, 3:20 am |
| RALINK RT2500 devices not working together | November 24, 2005, 10:23 am |
| Monitor mode in Conceptronic C54 (ralink 2500) | March 6, 2006, 4:13 am |
| WPA on Quickertek(Ralink) card on Mac Powerbook not working | April 6, 2008, 5:56 pm |
| Two Ralink WLAN cards on Windows server 2003 | August 4, 2007, 7:33 pm |
| choosing a 802.11g chipset | December 9, 2005, 1:54 am |
| Chipset Choice (p2) | July 2, 2006, 8:09 pm |
| Choice of chipset | July 2, 2006, 6:10 pm |
| Chipset/netstumbler question | January 17, 2006, 5:34 pm |

RALINK chipset Wireless NIC's
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 







> with Ralink's chipset. I'm using one myself,
> the SMCWPCI-GM which uses Ralink's RT61 chip.
>
> Is this the most popular solution? Besides mine,
> there are Gigabyte, Linksys and a few others that use it.
> I took a look at the various web sites to get some idea of
> driver support. Almost all the companies offered old drivers,
> while Ralink themselves, offer their
> reference drivers, updated frequently new as of
> December 2006. I'm using it myself, since it
> seems to contain the driver, utility and if I'm not mistaken,
> even updated Firmware thrown into the package
> somewhere.
>
> In my case, the driver on the CDrom was almost a
> year old, the driver at SMC site wouldn't install at all.
> What with the slightly unusual installation procedures,
> The hit and miss of the wireless signal itself
> (I'm currently in an apartment. No Line of site,
> 5 - 8 of my "neighbors" showing up in the ste
> survey). Im amazed it works at all.
>
> Dave